Official organ of the Association of Physiologist and Pharmacologists of India |
|
|
The
duration of stay in each compartment by all the six rats, during
five prelesion days (both during the day and night), and the mean
prelesion values along with the four postlesion values, were subjected
to two-way ANOVA, Student’s test was done between prelesion mean
and postlesion values. The data of day and night rectal temperatures
were also subject to the same analysis. As prelesion values are
compared with postlesion readings, a control group of rats in
which the vehicle of the drug was injected at the POA, is not
considered essential, at this stage.
RESULTSThermal preference in normal rats: The
thermal preference of the normal rats was 27°C (75.89% of the
total time recorded) on all five days of recording, and there
was no significant variation between the animals as shown by two
way ANOVA (Fig. 2). Also, there was no diurnal variation in the
temperature preferred by the rats (Fig. 3). The trend followed
by all the animals in preferring a temperature inside the chamber
was identical i.e., all animals preferred 27°C (75.89%) and spent
less time at 24°C (18.04%) and least at 30°C (4.42%) (Fig. 3).
Changes in thermal preference after the destruction of catecholaminergic terminals. On the third day, after destruction of the catecholaminergic terminals of the POA, the rats spent maximum time at 24°C (89.76±29.75 min), which was significantly higher (P < 0.001) when compared to the prelesion average value (Fig. 2). On the seventh postlesion day, the animals spent significantly (P<0.01) more time at 24°C (186.45±60.24 min) but it was less than the time spent by the animals on the third day (Fig. 2). Whereas, on the fourteenth and twenty first day the animals spent maximum time at 27°C (Fig. 2). This was higher than the time spent on the third and seventh day but not significantly different from the prelesion average values. Therefore, the rats spent the maximum time in the chamber maintained at 24°C on the third and seventh day after lesion and on the fourteenth and twentyfirst day postlesion they spent maximum time at 27°C. The time spent at 30°C was minimum throughout the study. Rectal temperature The average rectal temperature
of the normal rats during the day (36.52 ± 0.26°C) was slightly
lower than that at night (36.75 ± 0.04°C) (Fig. 4).
It was elevated after the
lesion of catecholaminergic terminals of the POA being as high
as 38.5 ± 0.39°C on the
third day after the lesion. The temperature elevation was highly
significant on the third and seventh day (P<0.001) and less
significant (P<0.05) on the fourteenth and twenty-first day
after the lesion (fig.4). The study shows that the normal rats preferred an ambient temperature of 27°C when allowed to choose between 24°C, 27°C and 30°C, whereas after the lesion of the catecholaminergic terminals of the POA, it preferred 24°C on the third and seventh day but spent more time at 27°C on the fourteenth and twenty first day. This indicates that the destruction of the catecholaminergic terminals of the POA creates an imbalance between the catecholaminergic and other inputs which increase the body temperature, and those which my lead to a decrease (8). Studies using other neurotoxins such as NMDA, which destroys the neurons of the POA, have also reported a severe hyperthermia during the first week and a mild hyperthermia subsequently (7,11, 12). Though the increase in rectal temperature was marked during the initial days, it was less marked during the second and third weeks after the lesion. This decrease cannot be attributed to a regeneration of catecholaminergic fibres, as these fibres were not found on postmortem histology, performed after three weeks. Thus, the hyperthermia produced due to destruction of the catecholaminergic terminals of the POA can be explained in the light of the previous studies (13, 14). Microinjection of adrenergic agonists into the mPOA a freely moving rats produced hypothermia whereas antagonists produced hyperthermia. Behavioural and non-behavioural responses complement each other in an animal, to maintain thermal homeostasis. This integration by the close-knit interaction amongst the different neuronal inputs is apparently affected after destruction of catecholaminergic fibres to the POA. After the lesion, the behavioural thermoregulation (which can bring down the body temperature) seems to be intact even though the non-behavioural thermoregulatory mechanism was affected, resulting in increased rectal temperature. In other words, the imbalance created by the destruction of catecholaminergic fibres has elevated the body temperature. But the animal recognizes this elevate temperature as a deviation from the normal homeostasis, and makes behavioural alterations to bring down the temperature by selecting a lower ambient temperature. The results of the study thus indicate that the catecholaminergic fibres of the POA do play a role in physiological thermoregulation, though it may not play a direct role in behavioural thermoregulation. The higher rectal temperature (though less significant) obtained two to three weeks after the lesion, was not accompanied by a significant shift in the thermal preference. Though this finding may not support the above mentioned hypothesis, larger number of observations may be required to state anything conclusively. It can be concluded that after destruction of the catecholaminergic fibres of the POA, there was dissociation between the behavioural thermoregulation which favours the lowering of body temperature and those non-behavioural changes which have brought the body temperature at a higher level.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The financial assistance
from life Science Research Board is acknowledged. 1. Satinoff E, Rutstein J. Behavioural thermoregulation in rats with anterior hypothalamic lesions. J Comp Physiol Psychol 1970; 71: 77-82. 2. Teague RS, Ranson SW. The role of anterior hypothalamus in temperature regulation. Am J Physiol 1936; 117: 562-570. 3. Gordon JH. Relationship between preferred ambient temperature and autonomic thermoregulatory functions in rat. Am J Physiol 1987; 252: R1130-R1137. 4. Carlisle JH. Effect of preoptic and anterior hypothalamic lesions on behavioural thermoregulation in cold. J Comp Physiol Psychol 1969; 69: 391-402. 5. Lipton JM. Effects of preoptic lesions on heat escape responding and colonic temperature in rat. Physiol Behav 1963; 3: 165-169. 6. Feldberg W, Myers RD. Changes in temperature produced by microinjections of amines into the anterior hypothalamus of cats. J Physiol 1965: 177: 239-245. 7. Ray B, Mallick H, Kumar VM. Role of the medial preoptic area in thermal preference of rats. Indian J Physiol Pharmaol 2001; 45: 445-450. 8. De Groot J. The rat forebrain in stereotaxic coordinates. Trans R Neth Acad Sci 1959; 52: 1-40. 9. Ramesh V and Kumar VM. Changes in sleep-wakefulness after 6-hydroxydopamine lesion of the preoptic area. Neuroscience 200; 98: 549-553. 10. Feldberg W, Myers RD. Effects on temperature of amines injected into the cerebral ventricles. A new concept of temperature regulation. J Physiol (Lond) 1964; 173: 226-237. 11. Kumar VM, Khan NA. Role of the preoptic neurons in thermoregulation in rats. Arch Clin Exp Med 1998;l 7: 24-27. 12. Ray B, Mallick H, Kumar VM. Role of preoptic area in terminal preference of rats. Sleep research Online 1999; (2(suppl 1): 619. 13. Datta S, Mohan Kumar V, Chhina GS, Singh B. Tonic activity of medial preoptic norepinephrine mechanism for body temperature maintenance in sleeping and awake rats. Brain Res Bull 1985; 15: 447-451. 14. Ramesh V, Kumar VM. The role
of alpha-2 receptors in the medial preoptic area in the regulation
of sleep-wakefulness and body temperature. Neuroscience 1998;
85: 807-817. |
|
for more queries contact : Executive editor, Department of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, N.Delhi - 29, mail id: exec_edit@ijpp.com |
© Copyright 2003 Allrights reserved to IJPP (indian journal of physiology and pharmacology) |
POWERED BY MIRROR ALLIANCE |