Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case series
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Media and News
Medial Education
Medical Education
Obituary
Opinion Article
Original Article
Review Article
Short Communication
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case series
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Media and News
Medial Education
Medical Education
Obituary
Opinion Article
Original Article
Review Article
Short Communication
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case series
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Media and News
Medial Education
Medical Education
Obituary
Opinion Article
Original Article
Review Article
Short Communication
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/IJPP_148_2024

Comprehensive intervention strategies in N-Methyl N-Nitrosourea-testosterone-induced prostate cancer: Exploring the multifaceted impact of dutasteride and docetaxel nanostructured lipid carriers on hormonal, oxidative, immunological and histological parameters

Department of Pharmacology, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Krishna Institute of Pharmacy, Malkapur, Maharashtra, India.
Department of Pharmacology, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Malkapur, Maharashtra, India.
Department of Pharmacognosy, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Krishna Institute of Pharmacy, Malkapur, Maharashtra, India.

*Corresponding author: Anup A. Patil, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth Krishna Institute of Pharmacy, Malkapur, Maharashtra, India. anuppatil.pharma@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Patil AA, Salve PS, Sawale JA. Comprehensive intervention strategies in N-Methyl N-Nitrosourea-testosterone-induced prostate cancer: Exploring the multifaceted impact of dutasteride and docetaxel nanostructured lipid carriers on hormonal, oxidative, immunological and histological parameters. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. doi: 10.25259/IJPP_148_2024

Abstract

Objectives:

This study investigates the impact of NMU-testosterone-induced prostate cancer on serum hormone levels, oxidative stress markers, cytokine profiles, and histological changes in the prostate gland. Additionally, it evaluates the therapeutic potential of Dutasteride Nanostructured Lipid Carriers (Dutasteride NLC) and Docetaxel Nanostructured Lipid Carriers (Docetaxel NLC) in modulating these pathological alterations.

Materials and Methods:

Male rats were divided into control and experimental groups, with prostate cancer induced using N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (NMU) and testosterone. Serum hormone levels, including testosterone, dihydrotestosterone (DHT), and prostate-specific antigen (PSA), were analyzed. Antioxidant enzyme activities (SOD, catalase, GR, GPx, and reduced glutathione) and lipid peroxidation levels were assessed to determine oxidative stress. Cytokine profiles were evaluated to examine immune dysregulation. Histopathological examination of prostate tissues was conducted to assess morphological alterations. Treatment groups received Dutasteride NLC, Docetaxel NLC, or a combination of both to determine their therapeutic effects.

Results:

Prostate cancer induction resulted in significant elevations in testosterone, DHT, and PSA levels, indicating hormonal imbalances. Oxidative stress markers showed increased lipid peroxidation and depletion of antioxidant enzymes in the PCa-induced group. Inflammatory cytokine levels were dysregulated, reflecting immune imbalances. Histological analysis revealed high-grade neoplasia, secretory cell proliferation, and stromal hyperplasia in the prostate tissue of cancer-induced rats. Treatment with Dutasteride NLC and Docetaxel NLC reduced hormone levels, restored antioxidant enzyme activity, and normalized cytokine levels. Histopathological examination showed improvements, with reduced neoplasia and stromal cell hyperplasia. Co-administration of Dutasteride NLC and Docetaxel NLC demonstrated superior therapeutic effects, indicating a synergistic action in mitigating cancer-related alterations.

Conclusion:

This study highlights the potential of Dutasteride NLC and Docetaxel NLC in counteracting prostate cancer-associated hormonal imbalances, oxidative stress, immune dysregulation, and histopathological alterations. The findings suggest a promising role for these nanocarrier-based therapies in prostate cancer management. Further research and clinical investigations are warranted to validate their efficacy in translational applications.

Keywords

Antioxidant enzymes
Dutasteride and docetaxel
Hormonal imbalance
Immunomodulation
Inflammatory
N-methyl-N-nitrosourea-testosterone
Oxidative stress
Prostate cancer
Superoxide dismutase

INTRODUCTION

In 2023, it was estimated that approximately 288,300 new cases of prostate cancer (PCa) of the prostate were diagnosed in the U.S., with 34,700 resulting in fatalities.[1]

PCa was more detected amongst black men than in white men, the exact reason remains unexplored.[2]

Males are primarily affected by PCa between the age group of 45 and 60 and rank as first of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in men worldwide.[3] It stands as the second most common cancer in men. PCa diagnosis typically involves health screening, prostate biopsy analysis, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, magnetic resonance imaging and digital rectal examination. The disease’s heterogeneity factors such as genetics, age, obesity, ethnicity and environmental conditions contribute to its varied epidemiology across different locations and racial groups.[4-6]

Detection of PCa often presents no clear symptoms, although symptoms include nocturia, difficulty initiating nocturia, difficulty initiating or maintaining urine flow, haematuria and dysuria frequent urination. Advanced stages of the disease can manifest symptoms such as bone pain, urinary and faecal incontinence, tingling, leg weakness and fatigue due to low red blood cell levels.[7,8]

Treatment for PCa includes chemotherapy radiation therapy, radical prostatectomy, high-intensity focused ultrasound, chemotherapy (including oral chemotherapeutic drugs like Temozolomide), cryosurgery, hormonal therapy or a combination of these modalities. Palliative care is also crucial for managing symptoms.[9]

Chemotherapeutic drugs such as docetaxel (Dxt) and cabazitaxel, administered intravenously on a 3-week cycle, inhibit tubulin depolymerisation, a process critical for mitotic cell division. However, traditional cytotoxic anticancer drugs pose challenges due to poor specificity, high toxicity and pharmaceutical resistance. Nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) offer a promising alternative for drug delivery, leveraging the enhanced permeability and retention effect to target tumours passively. Surface-engineering techniques further enhance NLC’s ability to precisely deliver drugs to tumour tissues, potentially improving therapeutic efficacy and minimising side effects.[10,11]

Research efforts have explored the effects of nanostructured lipid carriers containing dutasteride (Dut) and Dxt in experimentally induced PCa in rats, suggesting the potential for developing strategies that deliver multiple drugs or target various sites simultaneously.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials

Samples of Docetaxel (DXT) and dutasteride (DUT) were generously provided as a gift by Mac-Chem Labs Pvt. Ltd, based in Mumbai. The procurement of stearic acid was facilitated through Sigma-Aldrich Pvt. Ltd. (India). Oleic acid was sourced from Sun Pharmaceuticals Ltd, headquartered in Mumbai; The glyceryl monostearate utilized in this study was acquired directly from Croda Chemicals Pvt. Ltd (India); Poloxamer 407, an essential ingredient in the formulation procedure, was generously supplied as a complimentary sample by BASF India Ltd., with its headquarters situated in Mumbai, India. Tween 20, a fundamental element in the formulation, was procured from Central Drug House (Pvt) Ltd., based in New Delhi, India.

Method of NLC preparation

In this study, NLCs loaded with Dxt-NLC and Dut-NLC were developed to enhance therapeutic outcomes for PCa treatment. By selecting biocompatible lipids, and appropriate surfactants and using a hot homogenisation technique followed by ultrasonication, stable NLCs with high drug-loading capacity and nanoscale particle size (average diameter of 103.1 nm) were achieved. Comparative analysis of therapeutic dosages showed that NLCs allow significantly lower doses – 120 mg/kg body weight for Dxt-NLC and 0.5 mg/kg for Dut-NLC – while maintaining or enhancing efficacy, attributed to their improved bioavailability. These reduced dosages minimise systemic toxicity and side effects, potentially improving patient compliance. This study underscores the clinical advantage of NLCs in PCa treatment by providing an effective and safer alternative to traditional formulations.

PCa induction

The experimental protocol involved administering cyproterone acetate to rats at a dosage of 50 mg/kg for 21 consecutive days, dissolved in corn oil. On the 23rd day, the rats were given intraperitoneal injections of testosterone propionate at 100 mg/kg in corn oil for the subsequent 3 days. On the 27th day, a single intraperitoneal injection of N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (NMU) was administered at a 50 mg/kg concentration. Following a 1-week interval from NMU administration, rats were given daily intraperitoneal injections of testosterone propionate at 2 mg/kg in corn oil for the next 125 days.

The rats were divided into five groups, each consisting of 10 animals. Group I acted as the control, while PCa was induced in Group II using a modified version of the method described by Liao et al. (2002). The treatment groups (III: Dxt-NLC at 120 mg/kg body weight, IV: Dut-NLC at 0.5 mg/kg body weight and V: Dxt-NLC at 120 mg/kg body weight + Dut-NLC at 0.5 mg/kg body weight) received their respective treatments alongside a promoting dose of testosterone propionate (2 mg/kg body weight intraperitoneally in corn oil) from the 35th day to the 160th day. Animals were sacrificed with ketamine 50 mg/kg of the prostate gland and blood was removed for further estimation.[18-22] The study was conducted following the guidelines provided by the Institutional Ethical Committee Protocol No: IAEC/KIMS/2018/2.

Tissue processing

The processing of prostate tissue began with the removal of the prostate, which was then washed with ice-cold saline. Ventral prostate tissues were prepared at a 10% w/v concentration by homogenising them in chilled phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.4) using a homogeniser. The homogenate was filtered through muslin cloth and centrifuged at 3000 × g for 10 min at 4°C using a Remi Cooling Centrifuge (C-24 DL) to eliminate nuclear debris. The resulting supernatant was then subjected to a second centrifugation at 12000 × g for 20 min at 4°C to obtain the post-mitochondrial supernatant (PMS) used for various enzyme assays.

Preparation and estimation of parameters from PMS

The PMS obtained from the above centrifugation steps was utilised for the estimation of various biochemical parameters, including lipid peroxidation (LPO), reduced glutathione (GSH), catalase (CAT) activity, glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity, glutathione reductase (GR) activity and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity. Each assay was performed according to established protocols as detailed below.[23-29]

Estimation of hormone levels in serum

Serum levels of dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and testosterone were assessed using specialised enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits, following the guidelines provided by the manufacturer. To ensure the precision and consistency of the results, the assays were conducted in triplicate.[30]

Estimation of PSA levels in serum

Serum PSA levels were measured using a quantitative sandwich enzyme immunoassay technique. The PSA levels were determined according to the kit manufacturer’s protocol, and the results were expressed as ng/mL of serum.[31]

Measurement of LPO

LPO in the prostate tissues was assessed by measuring the concentration of malondialdehyde, a by-product of LPO. The tissues were homogenised in phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.4) at 10% w/v, followed by centrifugation as described earlier. The PMS was mixed with thiobarbituric acid and heated at 95°C for 1 h. The absorbance of the resulting pink colour was measured at 532 nm.[32]

Estimation of reduced GSH level

GSH levels in the prostate tissues were determined using the method of Jollow et al., with modifications. 1 mL of PMS and 1 mL of 4% sulphosalicylic acid were incubated at 4°C for 1 h. After centrifugation at 1200 × g for 15 min at 4°C, the supernatant was collected, and 0.4 mL was added to 2.2 mL of phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.4) and 0.4 mL of 5,5’-dithiobis (2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB). The yellow colour developed was measured at 412 nm, and GSH content was calculated as nmol DTNB conjugate formed per gram of tissue.[33]

Estimation of CAT

CAT activity in prostate tissues was measured according to Claiborne’s (1985) method. The reaction mixture consisted of 1.95 mL of 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), 1.0 mL of 0.019 M hydrogen peroxide and 0.05 mL of PMS. The decrease in absorbance at 240 nm due to the breakdown of hydrogen peroxide was monitored, and CAT activity was calculated as nmol H2O2 consumed per minute per milligram of protein.[34]

Estimation of GPx

GPx activity was assessed using the method described by Mohandas et al. (1984). The reaction mixture contained 1.44 ml of phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.4), 0.1 mL of 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 0.1 mL of 1.0 mM sodium azide, 0.05 mL of 1 eu/mL GR, 0.05 mL of 1.0 mM reduced GSH, 0.1 mL of 0.2 mM nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH), 0.01 mL of 0.25 mM hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and 0.1 mL of PMS. The reduction of NADPH was monitored at 340 nm, and GPx activity was expressed as nmol NADPH.[35]

Estimation of GR activity

GR activity was measured using Carlberg and Mannervik’s method (1975). The reaction mixture included 1.65 mL of phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.6), 0.1 mL of 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.05 mL of 1.0 mM oxidised GSH, 0.1 mL of 0.1 mM NADPH and 0.1 mL of PMS. The decrease in absorbance due to NADPH oxidation was monitored at 340 nm, and GR activity was calculated as nmol NADPH oxidised per minute per milligram of protein using an extinction coefficient of 6.22 × 103 M-1 cm-1.[36]

Estimation of SOD activity

SOD activity was determined following the method of Marklund and Marklund (1974). The reaction mixture comprised 2.875 mL of Tris- Hydrochloric acid (HCl) buffer (50 mM, pH 8.5), 100 μL of PMS and pyrogallol (24 mM in 10 mM HCl) to a total volume of 3 mL. The auto-oxidation of pyrogallol was measured at 420 nm, and one unit of SOD activity was defined as the amount that inhibits the auto-oxidation by 50%.[37]

Estimation of cytokines by ELISA

Cytokine levels in the prostate tissues were quantified using ELISA kits. Tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) levels were measured with an e-Bioscience sandwich ELISA kit, while interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) and interleukin-10 (IL-10) levels were determined using ELISA kits from RAY Biotech, according to the manufacturer’s instructions.[38]

Histological investigation

For histological analysis, prostate tissues were fixed in freshly prepared 10% neutral buffered formalin at 4°C, followed by embedding in paraffin wax. Vertical sections (5 μm thick) were prepared and rehydrated through a graded series of ethyl alcohol, cleared in xylene and re-embedded in paraffin wax. The sections were then deparaffinised, stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and mounted in DPX. The histological sections were examined under a microscope (Olympus BX 51) for the assessment of morphological changes, including prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), secretory cell proliferation and stromal hyperplasia.[39,40]

RESULTS

Impact of Dut and Dxt nanostructured lipid carriers on serum hormones

In the PCa-induced group (Group II), there was a statistically significant increase in testosterone levels compared to the control group (Group I) (P < 0.01). Treatment with Dxt NLC in Group III, Dut NLC in Group IV and a combination of Dxt and Dut in Group V resulted in a statistically significant, dose-dependent decrease in testosterone levels (P < 0.05, P < 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively). Similarly, for DHT serum levels, the PCa-induced group (Group II) showed elevated levels compared to the control group (P < 0.01). Administration of Dxt NLC (Group III), Dut NLC (Group IV) and combination therapy (Group V) resulted in a dose-dependent reduction in DHT levels, with the combination therapy showing the most significant effect (P < 0.001). Elevated serum PSA levels were also observed in the PCa-induced group (Group II) compared to the control (P < 0.01). Treatment with Dxt NLC (Group III), Dut NLC (Group IV) and their combination (Group V) led to substantial and dose-dependent reductions in serum PSA levels, with statistical significance (P < 0.001 for the combination therapy). Confidence intervals for the reductions in testosterone, DHT and PSA levels were calculated, demonstrating robust effects across the treatment groups [Graph 1].

Dutasteride and docetaxel nanostructured on impact serum hormone levels. Values are expressed in mean ± standard error of the mean. statistical analysis is done by one-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. #P<0.001 when compare with Group I, *P<0.01,**P<0.001 when compared with Group II. DHT: Dihydrotestosterone level, PSA: Prostate-specific antigen level
Graph 1:
Dutasteride and docetaxel nanostructured on impact serum hormone levels. Values are expressed in mean ± standard error of the mean. statistical analysis is done by one-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. #P<0.001 when compare with Group I, *P<0.01,**P<0.001 when compared with Group II. DHT: Dihydrotestosterone level, PSA: Prostate-specific antigen level

Impact of Dut and Dxt nanostructured lipid carriers on antioxidants

The PCa-induced group (Group II) exhibited a significant decline in antioxidant enzyme activities, including GR, GPx and CAT, as well as reduced GSH levels, alongside an increase in LPO (P < 0.01 for all parameters compared to the control group). Administration of Dut and Dxt NLCs in Groups III, IV and V resulted in a statistically significant, dose-dependent restoration of these antioxidant levels to near-normal values (P < 0.05 for GR, GPx and CAT; P < 0.001 for GSH levels and reduction in LPO). Bonferroni’s multiple comparison analysis using confirmed the significance of differences between treatment groups and the PCa-induced group [Table 1].

Table 1: Dutasteride and docetaxel nanostructured lipid carriers impact the antioxidant.
Groups ➨
Antioxidant Enzyme ⬇
Group I Group II Group III Group IV Group V
GR nmol 299.59±2.3* 40.43±0.63# 192.08±1.4* 209±3.2* 251.81±1.9*
GPx nmol 103.98±0.4* 14.04±0.2 60.10±1.96* 78.79±1.3* 90.95±0.8*
GSH nmol 535.70±1.4* 216.41±0.5# 237.84±0.1* 272.12±0.3* 304.93±0.2*
SOD U/mg 11.16±0.4* 1.94±0.10# 2.65±0.2* 5.5±0.2* 8.86±0.1*
CAT 142±0.2* 39.62±0.2# 100.10±0.3* 102.98±0.5* 152.81±0.1*
LPO nmol 042.21±0.6* 89.92±0.9# 72.38±0.8* 49.41±0.6* 50.89±0.6*

Values are expressed in mean±standard error of the mean. Statistical analysis is done by one-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. #P<0.001 when compared with Group I *P<0.01 when compared with Group II. GSH: Glutathione, GR: Glutathione reductase, GPx: Glutathione peroxidase, SOD: Superoxide dismutase, CAT: Catalase, LPO: Lipid peroxidation

Impact of Dut and Dxt nanostructured lipid carriers on cytokines and anti-inflammatory cytokine (IL-10) levels

In the PCa-induced group (Group II), there was a significant elevation in pro-inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 and IFN-γ, accompanied by a decrease in the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 (P < 0.01 for all compared to the control group). Treatment with Dut and Dxt NLCs in Groups III and IV significantly and dose-dependently restored cytokine levels to near-normal values, with a notable increase in IL-10 levels (P < 0.05 for cytokines; P < 0.001 for IL-10). Co-administration of Dut and Dxt NLCs in Group V also exhibited significant restoration of cytokine levels to normal (P < 0.001 for IL-10 restoration) [Graph 2].

Dutasteride and docetaxel nanostructured lipid carriers impact on serum cytokine levels. Values are expressed in mean ± standard error of the mean. Statistical analysis is done by one-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. #P<0.001 when compared with Group I, *P<0.01,**P<0.001 when compared with Group II. TNF: Tumor necrosis factor, IL: Interleukin
Graph 2:
Dutasteride and docetaxel nanostructured lipid carriers impact on serum cytokine levels. Values are expressed in mean ± standard error of the mean. Statistical analysis is done by one-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. #P<0.001 when compared with Group I, *P<0.01,**P<0.001 when compared with Group II. TNF: Tumor necrosis factor, IL: Interleukin

Impact Dut and Dxt nanostructured lipid carriers on histopathological changes

Histological examination of prostate tissue using H&E staining revealed high-grade PIN with significant secretory cell proliferation and stromal hyperplasia in the PCa-induced group (Group II), compared to the control group. Administration of Dut NLC in Group IV showed low-grade PIN with stromal cell hyperplasia. In contrast, Dxt NLC in Group III demonstrated low-grade PIN with prostate atrophy and acinar degenerative changes. The combination of Dut NLC and Dxt NLC in Group V resulted in the most significant histological improvements, including low-grade PIN, reduced secretory cell proliferation and notable atrophy with degenerative changes in the prostate acini (P < 0.001 for all histopathological changes compared to the PCa-induced group) [Figure 1].

Effect of dutasteride and docetaxel nanostructured lipid carriers on histopathology changes. Group I (Control): Normal histoarchitecture of the prostate gland. Well-organized glandular structures with intact epithelial lining. No evidence of neoplasia, cellular proliferation, or inflammatory infiltration. Normal stromal composition without hyperplasia or fibrotic changes. Group II (PCa-Induced Group): High-grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia (PIN) observed. Increased secretory cell proliferation with loss of normal glandular architecture. Stromal hyperplasia with an increase in fibroblasts and extracellular matrix deposition. Presence of nuclear pleomorphism, increased mitotic activity, and hyperchromasia. Evidence of inflammatory infiltration and disrupted basement membrane. Group III (DxtNLC Treatment): Low-grade PIN with reduced glandular proliferation. Moderate reduction in stromal hyperplasia, indicating partial recovery. Atrophy of prostate acini, with degenerative changes in epithelial cells. Fewer mitotic figures and reduced nuclear pleomorphism compared to Group II. Group IV (Dut-NLC Treatment): Presence of low-grade PIN, but with less stromal hyperplasia than Group III. Significant reduction in secretory cell proliferation, showing therapeutic impact. Stromal components show moderate fibrosis, but no severe abnormalities. Improved cellular morphology with less nuclear pleomorphism and mitotic activity. Group V (Dxt-NLC + Dut-NLC Co-administration): Marked improvement in histoarchitecture with near-normal glandular structures. Minimal PIN and reduced secretory cell proliferation. Lower stromal hyperplasia compared to other treatment groups. Atrophic and degenerative changes in acinar cells significantly reduced. Enhanced restoration of normal prostate tissue, indicating a synergistic therapeutic effect. Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) 400X.
Figure 1:
Effect of dutasteride and docetaxel nanostructured lipid carriers on histopathology changes. Group I (Control): Normal histoarchitecture of the prostate gland. Well-organized glandular structures with intact epithelial lining. No evidence of neoplasia, cellular proliferation, or inflammatory infiltration. Normal stromal composition without hyperplasia or fibrotic changes. Group II (PCa-Induced Group): High-grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia (PIN) observed. Increased secretory cell proliferation with loss of normal glandular architecture. Stromal hyperplasia with an increase in fibroblasts and extracellular matrix deposition. Presence of nuclear pleomorphism, increased mitotic activity, and hyperchromasia. Evidence of inflammatory infiltration and disrupted basement membrane. Group III (DxtNLC Treatment): Low-grade PIN with reduced glandular proliferation. Moderate reduction in stromal hyperplasia, indicating partial recovery. Atrophy of prostate acini, with degenerative changes in epithelial cells. Fewer mitotic figures and reduced nuclear pleomorphism compared to Group II. Group IV (Dut-NLC Treatment): Presence of low-grade PIN, but with less stromal hyperplasia than Group III. Significant reduction in secretory cell proliferation, showing therapeutic impact. Stromal components show moderate fibrosis, but no severe abnormalities. Improved cellular morphology with less nuclear pleomorphism and mitotic activity. Group V (Dxt-NLC + Dut-NLC Co-administration): Marked improvement in histoarchitecture with near-normal glandular structures. Minimal PIN and reduced secretory cell proliferation. Lower stromal hyperplasia compared to other treatment groups. Atrophic and degenerative changes in acinar cells significantly reduced. Enhanced restoration of normal prostate tissue, indicating a synergistic therapeutic effect. Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) 400X.

DISCUSSION

This study explored the impact of Dut and Dxt nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) on various biochemical parameters, including serum hormones, antioxidants, cytokines and histopathological changes in a PCa model. Our findings provide significant insights into the therapeutic potential of these NLCs in managing PCa and its associated pathological alterations. To better contextualise our results, we compare our findings with existing literature, analyse potential clinical implications and acknowledge the limitations of our study.

Our results indicate that PCa induction led to a significant increase in testosterone and DHT levels in the PCa-induced group (Group II), consistent with the established role of androgens in promoting PCa progression.[41] This observation aligns with previous studies that underscore the significance of androgen regulation in PCa pathogenesis.[42] The administration of Dut and Dxt NLCs in Groups III, IV and V resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in both testosterone and DHT levels, with the combination of Dut and Dxt in Group V being particularly effective. This finding suggests that the NLC formulation enhances the therapeutic efficacy of these drugs, likely due to improved bioavailability and targeted delivery, as demonstrated in similar studies using NLCs in cancer treatment.[43]

The reduction in serum PSA levels further corroborates the therapeutic impact of these NLCs, reinforcing their potential to suppress PCa progression.[44] Notably, the ability to achieve these effects at lower therapeutic dosages underscores the clinical relevance of our approach, as highlighted in our comparative analysis of therapeutic dosages.

The PCa -induced group exhibited a significant decline in key antioxidant enzymes (GR, GPx and CAT) and reduced GSH levels, alongside an increase in LPO, indicative of heightened oxidative stress. This oxidative stress is a well-documented contributor to cancer progression and resistance to therapy.[45] Treatment with Dut and Dxt NLCs effectively restored antioxidant levels in a dose-dependent manner, aligning with other studies showing the antioxidative benefits of NLCs in cancer models.[46] The restoration of antioxidant levels is crucial, as it suggests that these NLCs not only counteract oxidative stress but also potentially reverse oxidative damage, thereby enhancing the overall therapeutic outcome.

Our study also demonstrated significant elevations in pro-inflammatory cytokines and a decrease in the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 in the PCa-induced group, reflecting the inflammatory milieu typical of cancer progression.[47] Treatment with Dut and Dxt NLCs normalised cytokine levels and restored IL-10 levels, underscoring the potential of these NLCs to modulate the immune response by reducing inflammation and promoting anti-inflammatory pathways. This immunomodulatory effect is consistent with previous research that highlights the anti-inflammatory potential of NLCs in cancer therapy.[48] The ability to modulate the immune environment further enhances the therapeutic potential of these NLCs in inhibiting tumour growth and managing cancer-associated inflammation.

Histopathological analysis revealed that PCa induction resulted in high-grade PIN with significant secretory cell proliferation and stromal hyperplasia. Treatment with Dut and Dxt NLCs led to notable histological improvements, with Dut NLC treatment associated with low-grade PIN and reduced stromal cell hyperplasia, and Dxt NLC treatment resulting in low-grade PIN with prostate atrophy and acinar degenerative changes. The combination of Dut and Dxt NLCs in Group V further enhanced these effects, significantly reducing secretory cell proliferation, atrophy and degenerative changes in the prostate acini. These histological findings align with the biochemical data, supporting that combining Dut and Dxt NLCs exerts a synergistic effect in mitigating PCa progression.[49] This synergistic effect is also supported by other studies investigating the combination of NLCs with different therapeutic agents in cancer treatment.[50]

The findings from this study suggest that Dut and Dxt NLCs could offer a more effective treatment option for PCa by enhancing drug delivery, improving therapeutic efficacy and potentially reducing side effects due to lower required dosages. However, it is important to acknowledge the limitations of our study, particularly the need for further in vivo studies and clinical trials to validate these findings in a clinical setting. Future research should also explore the long-term effects of these NLCs and their impact on patient outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The study highlights the potential therapeutic benefits of Dut and Dxt NLC in modulating hormonal, oxidative and inflammatory responses associated with PCa. In addition, Dut and Dxt, NLCs when administered alone or in combination, demonstrated efficacy in ameliorating histological alteration in the prostate gland. Further research and clinical trials are warranted to explore the full therapeutic potential of these interventions in the management of PCa.

Ethical approval:

This study was conducted in accordance with the guidelines set by the Institutional Ethical Committee, and approval was obtained along with Animal House clearance under Protocol No. 1ARC/KIMS/2018/2.

Declaration of patient consent:

Patient’s consent is not required as there are no patients in this study.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. . Cancer facts and figures United States: American Cancer Society; .
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , . The prostate gland: A crossroad between the urinary and the seminal tracts. Prog Urol. 2012;22:66-80.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , . Translational bioinformatics for diagnostic and prognostic prediction of prostate cancer in the next-generation sequencing era. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:901578.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , et al. The heritability of prostate cancer in the Nordic twin study of cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23:2303-10.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , et al. Comparison of screen-detected and clinically diagnosed prostate cancer in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer, section Rotterdam. Urology. 2005;174:121-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Prostate cancer treatment (PDQ®) . NCI. Available from: https://www.cancer.gov/types/prostate/patient/prostate-treatment-pdq [Last accessed on 2014 Jul 01]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. . American Cancer Society. Available from: https://www.cancer.org/treatment/treatments-and-side-effects/palliative-care.html [Last accessed on 2014 Aug 20]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , . Exploitation of the androgen receptor to overcome taxane resistance in advanced prostate cancer. Adv Cancer Res. 2015;127:123-58.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , . Principles of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics In: , , , eds. Principles of antineoplastic drug development and pharmacology. New York: Marcel Dekker; . p. :123-42.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , . A new concept for macromolecular therapeutics in cancer chemotherapy: mechanism of tumor tropic accumulation of proteins and the antitumor agent. Cancer Res. 1968;6:193-210.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , . Solid lipid nanoparticles: Production, characterization, and applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2001;47:165-96.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , . Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) for controlled drug delivery-a review of the state of the art. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2000;50:161-77.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , . Lipid nanoparticles (SLN, NLC) in cosmetic and pharmaceutical dermal products. Int J Pharm. 2009;366:170-84.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , . Solid lipid nanoparticles-A review. Int J Appl Pharm. 2013;5:8-18.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , . Lipid nanoparticles: Production, characterization and stability about oral administration. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2014;15:6-19.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , . Lipid-based drug delivery systems for enhancing drug bioavailability and efficacy. Res J Pharm Technol. 2019;12:2417-26.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , . Solid lipid nanoparticles: A modern formulation approach in drug delivery system. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2009;71:349-58.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , . Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) in cosmetic and dermatological preparations. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2002;54(Suppl 1):S131-55.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , . Characterization of the effects of antiandrogens on the prostate and seminal vesicle of intact and castrated rats. Endocrinology. 2002;143:5247-54.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , . Induction of prostate adenocarcinomas in Lobund-Wistar rats by treatments with N-nitroso-Nmethylurea and testosterone. Cancer Res. 1986;46:676-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , . Genetically defined mouse models that mimic natural aspects of human prostate cancer development. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2004;11:225-54.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , . Animal models of prostate cancer. Prostate. 2001;48:146-55.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , . A spectrophotometric method for measuring the breakdown of hydrogen peroxide by catalase. J Biol Chem. 1952;195:133-40.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. , , . Assay for lipid peroxides in animal tissues by thiobarbituric acid reaction. Anal Biochem. 1979;95:351-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , . Bromobenzene-induced liver necrosis: Protective role of glutathione and evidence for 3,4-bromobenzene oxide as the hepatotoxic metabolite. Pharmacology. 1974;11:151-69.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. . Catalase activity In: , ed. Handbook of methods for oxygen radical research. United States: CRC Press; . p. :283-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , , . Low activities of glutathione-related enzymes as factors in the genesis of urinary bladder cancer. Cancer Res. 1984;44:5086-91.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , . Purification and characterization of the flavoenzyme glutathione reductase from rat liver. J Biol Chem. 1975;250:5475-80.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. , . Involvement of the superoxide anion radical in the autoxidation of pyrogallol and a convenient assay for superoxide dismutase. Eur J Biochem. 1974;47:469-74.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. , , . A simple and efficient method for the estimation of testosterone by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2016;7:2456-61.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. , . Quantitative sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the determination of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. J Immunol Methods. 2005;303:37-45.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. , . Microsomal lipid peroxidation. Methods Enzymol. 1978;52:302-310.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. , , . Determination of glutathione in tissues and its relation to the toxicity of acetaminophen. Biochem Pharmacol. 1974;23:1789-94.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. . Catalase activity In: , ed. Methods in enzymology. Vol 105. United States: Academic Press; . p. :350-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. , , . Glutathione peroxidase: A method for the determination of activity in erythrocytes. J Lab Clin Med. 1984;104:655-61.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. , . Glutathione reductase. Methods Enzymol. 1975;113:484-90.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. , , , . The estimation of red cell superoxide dismutase activity. J Lab Clin Med. 1975;85:337-341.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. , (n.d.). Human TNF-alpha ELISA kit. Thermo Fisher Scientific. Available from: https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/BMS607 [Last accessed on Mar 30]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. , . Theory and practice of histological techniques (6th ed). United Kingdom: Churchill Livingstone; . p. :320-329.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. , , . Histopathological study of prostate cancer using various staining techniques. Oncol Rep. 2015;33:1685-90.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. , , . Androgens and prostate cancer: A review of the current literature. Cancer Treat Rev. 2015;41:773-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. , , . Role of androgen receptor signaling in prostate cancer: A review. Am J Cancer Res. 2016;6:2269-80.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. , , . Nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) for the delivery of anticancer drugs: An overview. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2020;57:101-24.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. , . Prostate-specific antigen and prostate cancer: The role of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors. Ther Adv Urol. 2017;9:265-74.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. , , . Role of oxidative stress in prostate cancer: A review. J Cancer Res Ther. 2017;13:539-47.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. , , , . Nanostructured lipid carriers as a novel approach for the delivery of anticancer drugs: A review. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2021;16:442-53.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. , , . Role of inflammatory cytokines in prostate cancer: A review. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018;144:1603-16.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. , , , . Nanostructured lipid carriers: A promising drug delivery system in cancer therapy. J Nanobiotechnol. 2019;17:24.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. , , , , . Synergistic effects of docetaxel and dutasteride in a prostate cancer model. Sci Rep. 2020;10:2382.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. , , . Nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) as a promising delivery system for enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of anticancer agents: A review. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2021;61:102304.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections

Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology

Copyright Form


Title of the Manuscript: ________________________________________


I/We certify that I/we have participated sufficiently in the intellectual content, conception, and design of this work, or the analysis and interpretation of the data (when applicable), as well as the writing of the manuscript, to take public responsibility for it. I/We agree to have my/our name(s) listed as contributors and confirm that the manuscript represents valid work.

Each author confirms they meet the criteria for authorship as established by the ICMJE. Neither this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content under my/our authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere, except as described in the covering letter.

I/We certify that all data collected during the study is presented in this manuscript and that no data from the study has been or will be published separately. I/We agree to provide, upon request by the editors, any data/information on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees.

I/We have disclosed all financial interests, direct or indirect, that exist or may be perceived to exist for individual contributors in connection with the content of this manuscript in the cover letter. Sources of outside support for the project are also disclosed in the cover letter.

In accordance with open access principles, I/we grant the Journal the exclusive right to publish and distribute this work under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA) license. This license permits others to distribute, transform, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for non-commercial purposes, provided appropriate credit is given to the creator(s). Any adaptations must be shared under the same license terms. The key elements of the CC BY-NC-SA license are:

  • BY: Credit must be given to the original creator(s).
  • NC: Only non-commercial uses of the work are permitted.
  • SA: Adaptations must be shared under the same license terms.

I/We retain academic rights to the material, and the Journal is authorized to:

  1. Grant permission to republish the article in whole or in part, with or without fee.
  2. Produce preprints or reprints and translate the work into other languages for sale or free distribution.
  3. Republish the work in a collection of articles in any mechanical or electronic format.

I/We give the rights to the corresponding author to make necessary changes as requested by the Journal, handle all correspondence on our behalf, and act as the guarantor for the manuscript.

All individuals who have made substantial contributions to the work but do not meet the criteria for authorship are named in the Acknowledgment section with their written permission. If no acknowledgment is provided, it signifies that no substantial contributions were made by non-authors.


Name of the author(s) Signature Date signed Corresponding author?
Yes/No
Yes/No
Yes/No