Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case series
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Media and News
Medial Education
Medical Education
Obituary
Opinion Article
Original Article
Review Article
Short Communication
Systemic Review
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case series
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Media and News
Medial Education
Medical Education
Obituary
Opinion Article
Original Article
Review Article
Short Communication
Systemic Review
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case series
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Media and News
Medial Education
Medical Education
Obituary
Opinion Article
Original Article
Review Article
Short Communication
Systemic Review
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/IJPP_585_2025

Protective effects of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (Tadalafil) in stress-induced anxiety, depression and gastric ulceration in rats

Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

*Corresponding author: Rishi Pal, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. rishipal@kgmcindia.edu

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Verma SK, Pal R, Sharma A, Dixit RK, Nath R. Protective effects of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (Tadalafil) in stress-induced anxiety, depression and gastric ulceration in rats. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. doi: 10.25259/IJPP_585_2025

Abstract

Objectives:

Prolonged stress is known to precipitate neuropsychiatric and gastrointestinal disorders through disruption of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, activation of neuroinflammatory pathways and oxidative damage to the gastric mucosa. Phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitors, including tadalafil, facilitate cyclic guanosine monophosphate-dependent vasodilation, enhance neuroplastic mechanisms and exert anti-inflammatory effects. The role of PDE5 inhibitors in stress modulation and gastric ulceration is not well understood. Therefore, the present study assessed the potential anxiolytic, antidepressant-like effect and gastroprotective actions of tadalafil in restraint stress (RS)-induced changes.

Materials and Methods:

Forty-eight adult Wistar rats (either sex) were randomised into eight groups (n = 6): normal control, -stress (RS, 4 h daily × 7 days), RS + diazepam (2 mg/kg, i.p.), RS + imipramine (30 mg/kg, p.o.), RS + ranitidine (150 mg/kg, p.o.) and RS + tadalafil (2, 5 or 10 mg/kg, p.o.). Behaviour was assessed using the Elevated Plus Maze and Open-Field Test. Gastric ulcer index (UI), serum corticosterone, brain tumour necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and interleukin 1β (IL-1β) were quantified by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technique. Dose–response trends were analysed by linear regression.

Results:

RS significantly increased anxiety index (0.90 ± 0.02 vs. 0.80 ± 0.01; P < 0.001), reduced locomotor activity (crossings: 16.0 ± 5.9 vs. 43.5 ± 4.4; P < 0.001) and raised UI (7.24 ± 0.38 vs. 2.09 ± 0.25 mm2; P < 0.0001). Tadalafil (10 mg/kg) reversed the anxiety index to values comparable with those of stress (0.90 ± 0.02 vs. 0.74 ± 0.02; P < 0.05) and reduced UI to 2.32 ± 0.21 mm2 (P < 0.001), findings comparable with those of diazepam and ranitidine. RS caused an increase in TNF-α (15.27 ± 1.66 pg/mL) and IL-1β (16.09 ± 2.71 pg/mL) (P < 0.001). Treatment with tadalafil reduced these cytokine levels in a dose-dependent manner (TNF-α = −0.223, IL-1β = −0.376); tadalafil (10 mg/kg) reduced serum corticosterone levels compared with the stress group (10.88 ± 1.76 vs. 16.61 ± 1.09 ng/mL, P < 0.05). Linear regression analysis demonstrated a significant inverse dose–response relationship for both the anxiety index (β = −0.0067, R2 = 0.576, P = 0.0003) and UI (β = −0.0733, R2 = 0.408, P = 0.0043).

Conclusion:

Tadalafil exhibits notable anxiolytic and gastroprotective activity in restraint-stressed rats, highlighting PDE5 inhibition as a potential multi-target therapeutic approach for stress-induced neuropsychiatric and gastrointestinal disorders.

Keywords

Anxiety
Cytokines
Gastric ulcer
Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor
Restraint stress
Tadalafil

INTRODUCTION

Stress is a ubiquitous psychophysiological response that, when chronic, precipitates a spectrum of mental and physical disorders.[1] Epidemiological data reveal that anxiety and depression affect approximately 27–28% of the global population, with even higher rates in socio-economically stressed cohorts.[2,3] Concurrently, chronic psychological stress disrupts gastrointestinal homeostasis, predisposing to gastric ulceration through neuro-endocrine activation and mucosal oxidative injury.[4] Current pharmacotherapies – selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, benzodiazepines and proton-pump inhibitors – address individual facets of these comorbidities but seldom their shared pathophysiology.[5]

The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis orchestrates the mammalian stress response through corticotropin-releasing hormone and glucocorticoid release.[6] Sustained activation engenders hippocampal neuronal loss, monoaminergic imbalance, microglial activation and systemic inflammation marked by elevated tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β).[7,8] These cytokines not only impair neuroplasticity but also compromise gastric mucosal defences by enhancing oxidative stress and attenuating mucus–bicarbonate secretion.[1,9]

Phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitors – originally developed for erectile dysfunction – potently increase intracellular cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) by preventing its hydrolysis.[10] Downstream activation of protein kinase G (PKG) enhances endothelial nitric-oxide production, vasodilation, anti-inflammatory signalling and neurotrophic gene expression.[11] Pre-clinical studies demonstrate that PDE5 inhibition attenuates anxiety- and depression-like behaviours in rodents, an effect linked to hippocampal brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) up-regulation.[12] In addition, cGMP-dependent vasodilation improves splanchnic perfusion, while suppression of TNF-α and oxidative stress confers gastroprotection against indomethacin- or ethanol-induced ulcers.[13]

Tadalafil, distinguished by a 17.5-h half-life and high PDE5 selectivity, crosses the blood–brain barrier and exerts sustained tissue cGMP elevation.[14,15] Yet, its integrated efficacy against stress-induced anxiety, depression-like states and gastric ulceration remains unexplored. We therefore investigated whether tadalafil could simultaneously mitigate behavioural dysfunction and mucosal injury in a validated rat model of chronic restraint stress (RS), benchmarking its effects against diazepam, imipramine and ranitidine.

TNF-α and IL-1β were chosen because these cytokines are central mediators of neuroinflammation and stress-induced behavioural and gastric changes, showing consistent correlation with HPA axis activation and neuroimmune signalling. C-reactive protein (CRP), while a systemic marker, is less sensitive in rodents and myeloperoxidase activity primarily reflects local neutrophil infiltration rather than central inflammatory processes relevant to stress physiology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals and housing

Forty-eight healthy adult Wistar rats (200–250 g, either sex) were procured from the institutional animal house. They were housed in polypropylene cages (six per cage) under controlled temperature (25 ± 2°C), 60–70% relative humidity and a 12 h light/dark cycle with standard pellet diet and water ad libitum. After 1 week of acclimatisation, rats were randomly allocated to eight groups (n = 6 per group) using computer-generated random numbers. All procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC), King George’s Medical University (approval No. 185/IAEC/2023/R) and conducted in accordance with the Committee for Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals guidelines, India.

The sample size (n = 6 per group) was chosen based on prior studies using similar behavioural and biochemical endpoints, which typically demonstrate statistically significant effects with six animals per group under comparable experimental conditions. The selected tadalafil doses (2, 5 and 10 mg/kg, p.o.) were derived from published pre-clinical studies showing behavioural and anti-inflammatory efficacy in rats within this range.

Drugs and chemicals

Tadalafil was suspended in 1% maize oil. Imipramine hydrochloride, ranitidine and diazepam were freshly prepared on each experimental day. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits for TNF-α and IL-1β, as well as corticosterone, were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Experimental design

  • Group 1: (Normal control) received maize oil 1 ml/kg, p.o. daily

  • Group 2: (RS) was subjected to RS without a drug

  • Group 3: RS + Imipramine 30 mg/kg, p.o

  • Group 4: RS + Ranitidine 150 mg/kg, p.o

  • Group 5: RS + Diazepam 2 mg/kg, i.p

  • Groups 6–8: RS + Tadalafil 2, 5 or 10 mg/kg, p.o., respectively.

All treatments were administered once daily, 1 h before stress induction, for 7 consecutive days.

Stress protocol

RS was induced by placing each rat in an adjustable transparent Plexiglas restrainer for 4 h daily for 7 days16. After each session, animals were returned to their home cages.

Behavioural assessments

Elevated plus maze (EPM)

On day 8, rats were individually placed at the centre of a plus-shaped maze (50 cm height, open arm 50 × 10 cm) and recorded for 5 min. The number of open-arm (OE) and closed-arm (CE) entries, time spent in open arms (OT) and closed arms (CT) was noted. Anxiety index was calculated as 1 – [(OT/300) + (OE/(OE+CE))]/2.[16]

Open field test (OFT)

Immediately after EPM, rats were placed in a square arena (60 × 60 × 40 cm) for 5 min. Parameters recorded: number of squares crossed (locomotion), rearings, latency to move from the centre and faecal pellet count.[17]

Biochemical analyses

After behavioural testing, rats were euthanised under sodium pentobarbital (35 mg/kg, i.p.). Trunk blood was collected; serum was separated at 3000 rpm (4°C, 10 min) for corticosterone estimation. Brains were rapidly dissected, washed with ice-cold saline and homogenised in phosphate-buffered saline. TNF-α and IL-1β were quantified in brain homogenates by ELISA following the manufacturer’s protocols.[18]

Gastric ulcer evaluation

Stomachs were excised, inflated with 1% formalin (2 mL), opened along the greater curvature and photographed under a dissecting microscope (×10). Ulcer index (UI) (mm2) was calculated as Σ (ulcer length × width) per stomach.[19]

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as mean ± Standard Error of the Mean. Inter-group differences were analysed by one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. Dose–response relationships were analysed by linear regression. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Behavioural outcomes

EPM

RS markedly reduced open-arm exploration versus controls (OE: 2.67 ± 0.52 vs. 6.50 ± 0.84, P < 0.001; OT: 45.33 ± 6.41 s vs. 56.67 ± 3.72 s, P < 0.05), elevating anxiety index to 0.90 ± 0.02 (vs. 0.80 ± 0.01, P < 0.001). Diazepam restored OE and OT to control levels (anxiety index 0.72 ± 0.02, P < 0.001 vs. RS). Tadalafil produced a dose-dependent reversal: 2 mg/kg modestly increased OE (4.17 ± 0.75, P > 0.05), whereas 10 mg/kg achieved anxiolytic equivalence with diazepam (OE 6.67 ± 0.52; anxiety index 0.74 ± 0.02, P < 0.001 vs. RS). Linear regression confirmed a significant inverse dose–response for anxiety index (β = −0.0067, R2 = 0.576, P = 0.0003) [Table 1 and Figure 1].

Table 1: Effect of Tadalafil on Anxiety-Like Behaviour in the Elevated Plus Maze (EPM).
Group Open Arm Entries Closed Arm Entries Time in Open Arms (s) Time in Closed Arms (s) Anxiety Index
Control 6.50±0.84 21.00±0.89 56.67±3.72 222.67±4.37 0.80±0.01
RS 2.67±0.52*** 30.83±1.72*** 45.33±6.41* 244.83±13.60* 0.90±0.02***
RS+Diazepam 7.17±0.41*** 15.00±1.26*** 63.67±3.14*** 166.67±9.29*** 0.72±0.02***
RS+Tadalafil (2 mg/kg) 4.17±0.75 21.83±1.47 55.00±5.37 206.00±3.90 0.79±0.02
RS+Tadalafil (5 mg/kg) 5.83±0.75* 19.50±1.64* 50.17±3.76 176.83±5.56* 0.78±0.01*
RS+Tadalafil (10 mg/kg) 6.67±0.52*** 16.67±1.63*** 59.00±5.48*** 169.17±15.41*** 0.74±0.02***

RS vs Control: significant increase in anxiety (***p<0.001). Diazepam vs RS: highly significant anxiety reduction (***p<0.001). Tadalafil 2 mg/kg: not significant vs RS. Tadalafil 5 mg/kg: mild reduction (*p<0.05 vs RS). Tadalafil 10 mg/kg: strong reduction (***p<0.001 vs RS). Values are expressed as mean±standard deviation (SD), n=6 per group. EPM: Elevated Plus Maze, RS: Restraint Stress, Time in arms is measured in seconds. Anxiety Index was calculated as 1 − ([Time in Open Arms/Total Time] + [Number of Entries in Open Arms/Total Entries])/2. Comparisons were made using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test

Effect of tadalafil on anxiety-like behaviour in the Elevated Plus Maze (Epm).
Figure 1:
Effect of tadalafil on anxiety-like behaviour in the Elevated Plus Maze (Epm).

OFT

RS suppressed locomotor activity (crossings 16.0 ± 5.9 vs. 43.5 ± 4.4, P < 0.001), rearings (6.17 ± 2.0 vs. 14.3 ± 1.4, P < 0.001) and increased latency to move (57.7 ± 6.7 s vs. 37.3 ± 2.7 s, P < 0.001). Tadalafil 10 mg/kg restored crossings (46.5 ± 3.9) and rearings (18.2 ± 3.2) to control levels while reducing latency to 13.8 ± 2.9 s (P < 0.001 vs. RS). Faecal pellet output, an autonomic stress indicator, fell from 5.17 ± 0.98 (RS) to 1.67 ± 1.03 (tadalafil 10 mg/kg, P < 0.05) [Table 2 and Figure 2].

Table 2: Effect of Tadalafil on Locomotor Behaviour in the Open-Field Test (OFT).
Group Crossings Rearing Latency (s) Fecal Pellets Locomotor Activity
Control 43.5±4.37 14.33±1.37 37.33±2.73 2.0±1.55 57.83±3.87
RS 16.0±5.93*** 6.17±2.04*** 57.67±6.68*** 5.17±0.98*** 22.17±6.18***
RS+Imipramine 30.67±5.57** 14.33±2.66** 43.67±3.20** 2.17±1.72** 45.0±7.29**
RS+Tadalafil (2 mg) 36.0±4.98* 12.67±5.09 27.17±5.12** 3.17±1.33 48.67±5.28
RS+Tadalafil (5 mg) 40.83±4.71** 14.33±1.21** 23.67±4.84** 2.67±1.21* 55.17±4.62**
RS+Tadalafil (10 mg) 46.5±3.89*** 18.17±3.19*** 13.83±2.93*** 1.67±1.03*** 64.67±3.39***

RS vs Control: reduced activity and increased stress markers (***p<0.001). Imipramine vs RS: significant improvement (**p<0.01). Tadalafil 2 mg/kg: mild improvement (*p<0.05 crossings; **p<0.01 latency). Tadalafil 5 mg/kg: clear improvement (**p<0.01 vs RS). . Tadalafil 10 mg/kg: robust effect (***p<0.001 vs RS). All values are expressed as percentages of the maximum observed mean value for each respective parameter across all experimental groups. Specifically, for each group, the percentage was calculated using the formula:% = (Group Mean/Maximum Mean Observed Among All Groups) × 100. For example, the group’s mean latency to move was divided by the highest latency mean recorded among all groups, then multiplied by 100 to obtain “% Latency to Move.” This normalisation facilitates direct comparison of behavioural parameters such as latency to move, number of crossings, number of rearing, and faecal pellet count across groups. Lower latency and faecal count indicate reduced anxiety/depression, while higher crossings and rearings indicate improved locomotor and exploratory behaviour

Effect of tadalafil on locomotor behaviour in the Open-Field Test (OFT).
Figure 2:
Effect of tadalafil on locomotor behaviour in the Open-Field Test (OFT).

Gastric ulceration

RS elevated UI to 7.24 ± 0.38 mm2 from 2.09 ± 0.25 mm2 in controls (P < 0.0001). Ranitidine decreased UI to 1.80 ± 0.21 mm2 (P < 0.0001 vs. RS). Tadalafil produced a graded reduction: 2 mg/kg (2.90 ± 0.31 mm2), 5 mg/kg (2.48 ± 0.28 mm2) and 10 mg/kg (2.32 ± 0.19 mm2), the latter being statistically indistinguishable from ranitidine. Linear regression demonstrated a significant inverse relationship between tadalafil dose and UI (β = −0.0733, R2 = 0.408, P = 0.0043) [Table 3 and Figure 4].

Table 3: Gastric Ulcer Index and Inflammatory Cytokine Levels.
Group Ulcer Index (mm2) TNF-α (pg/mg protein) IL-1β (pg/mg protein) Corticosterone (ng/mL)
Control 2.09±0.25 7.68±2.35 4.69±0.76 11.7±5.04
RS 7.24±0.38*** 15.27±1.66*** 16.09±2.71*** 16.61±1.09***
RS+Ranitidine 150 mg/kg 1.80±0.21*** 11.20±1.89 14.94±2.71 15.17±5.02
RS+Tadalafil (2 mg/kg) 2.90±0.31* 15.01±2.91 13.67±2.64 14.49±6.03
RS+Tadalafil (5 mg/kg) 2.48±0.28** 14.79±4.49* 11.88±2.70* 10.83±3.82**
RS+Tadalafil (10 mg/kg) 2.32±0.19*** 13.40±4.20*** 10.68±3.57*** 11.88±1.76**

RS vs Control: significant increase in ulcer index, TNF-α, IL-1β, and corticosterone (***p<0.001).Ranitidine vs RS: strong protection against ulcers (***p<0.001). Tadalafil 2 mg/kg vs RS: reduced ulcer index (*p<0.05), no significant cytokinechange. Tadalafil 5 mg/kg vs RS: reduced ulcer index (**p<0.01), decreased TNF-α, IL-1β (*p<0.05), and corticosterone (**p<0.01). Tadalafil 10 mg/kg vs RS: marked reduction in ulcer index (***p<0.001), lowered TNF-α, IL-1βand corticosterone (***p<0.001). Values represent the mean Gastric Ulcer Index observed in each group following restraint stress. The index was calculated using the following formula:. Gastric Ulcer Index = (Number of ulcers×Severity score)/Total number of animals. The severity score was graded based on macroscopic observation of lesions on a scale of 0–3 (0=no lesion, 1=superficial mucosal erosion, 2=deep ulceration, 3=perforation). Ranitidine served as the standard gastroprotective agent. Tadalafil was administered at doses of 2 mg/kg, 5 mg/kg, and 10 mg/kg intraperitoneally, 30 minutes before stress exposure.Values are expressed as mean±SD, n=6 per group. TNF-αand IL-1βlevels were measured in brain tissue homogenates, and corticosterone in serum. RS: Restraint stress

Effect of tadalafil on inflammatory cytokine levels.
Figure 3:
Effect of tadalafil on inflammatory cytokine levels.
Effect of tadalafil on Gastric Ulcer Index.
Figure 4:
Effect of tadalafil on Gastric Ulcer Index.

Inflammatory and endocrine markers

RS raised brain TNF-α to 15.27 ± 1.66 pg/mg protein from 7.68 ± 2.35 pg/mg (P < 0.001) and IL-1β to 16.09 ± 2.71 pg/mg from 4.69 ± 0.76 pg/mg (P < 0.001). Diazepam and imipramine each attenuated these cytokines (P < 0.01).

Tadalafil trended toward reductions (10 mg/kg: TNF-α 13.4 ± 4.2 pg/mg; IL-1β 10.7 ± 3.6 pg/mg), but regression slopes did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.449 and 0.109, respectively). Serum corticosterone levels were numerically elevated after RS (16.61 ± 1.09 ng/mL) but did not differ significantly among groups (F = 1.03, P = 0.427) [Table 3 and Figure 3].

DISCUSSION

The present study demonstrates, for the first time in an integrated model, that the long-acting PDE5 inhibitor tadalafil simultaneously mitigates RS-induced anxiety- and depression-like behaviours and attenuates gastric ulceration in a dose-dependent manner. Using validated behavioural paradigms, biochemical indices and macroscopic gastric assessment, we show that a 10 mg/kg dose of tadalafil achieves anxiolytic and gastroprotective efficacy comparable to standard reference drugs, while exerting modest anti-inflammatory effects.

Chronic RS reliably produced an anxiogenic phenotype— reduced open-arm exploration and increased anxiety index in the EPM, alongside diminished locomotion and exploratory drive in the OFT, mirroring findings in both rodent and human neuroimaging studies.[16,20] Tadalafil dose-dependently reversed these deficits, with the 10 mg/kg dose restoring behavioural indices to levels indistinguishable from diazepam [Table 1]. These effects align with previous reports where PDE5 inhibition enhanced hippocampal cGMP and activated the PKG–CREB–BDNF cascade, thereby promoting synaptic plasticity and mood resilience.[21,22] The absence of sedation (as evidenced by preserved or enhanced total crossings) supports a non-GABAergic mechanism, potentially circumventing the dependence liability associated with benzodiazepines.[23]

RS increased gastric UI seven-fold, consistent with mucosal hypoperfusion, oxidative damage and inflammatory cytokine release.[24] Tadalafil (10 mg/kg) reduced UI to values statistically equivalent to ranitidine [Table 3]. This protection is likely multifactorial: PDE5 inhibition elevates cGMP, enhancing nitric-oxide-mediated vasodilation in the gastric microvasculature,[25] while concomitant suppression of TNF-α and IL-1β attenuates neutrophil infiltration and lipid peroxidation.[19] Importantly, tadalafil conferred protection without acid suppression, distinguishing its mechanism from H2-receptor antagonists and potentially offering a safer long-term profile.[9]

Although RS robustly elevated brain TNF-α and IL-1β, cytokine reductions with tadalafil did not achieve statistical significance across all doses, possibly reflecting the short treatment window or partial engagement of anti-inflammatory pathways. Serum corticosterone did not differ among groups, a finding consistent with adaptive HPA-axis desensitisation following repeated restraint[16] and highlighting the need for time-course analyses in future studies.

The study strengths include (i) a validated chronic stress model with face, construct and predictive validity;[16,26] (ii) parallel benchmarking against standard anxiolytic, antidepressant and anti-ulcer drugs; (iii) demonstration of clear dose–response relationships for both behavioural and gastric endpoints (R2 = 0.576 and 0.408, respectively) and (iv) use of an FDA-approved drug with well-characterised pharmacokinetics. Collectively, the data support repurposing tadalafil as a multi-modal agent for stress-related neuro-gastrointestinal co-morbidities, addressing an unmet clinical need for integrated therapeutics.[27,28]

Mechanistic pathways (cGMP–PKG–CREB, BDNF expression) were inferred rather than directly measured. Monoaminergic neurotransmitter quantification and additional depression-specific paradigms (e.g. forced swim or sucrose preference tests) would strengthen the antidepressant claim. Finally, chronic dosing studies and cross-species validation are warranted to confirm long-term safety and translational relevance.

Subsequent work should employ molecular assays (Western blotting, quantitative polymerase chain reaction) to confirm cGMP/PKG/BDNF signalling, extend the observation period to model chronic stress and progress to early-phase human trials in populations with comorbid anxiety and functional gastrointestinal disorders.

CONCLUSION

In a rat model of chronic RS, the PDE5 inhibitor tadalafil – most notably at 10 mg/kg – produced strong, dose-dependent anxiolytic and antidepressant-like effects, along with protection of the gastric mucosa from ulceration. These effects were comparable to those of standard drugs (diazepam, imipramine and ranitidine), respectively and occurred without signs of sedation. The findings suggest tadalafil as a potential therapeutic option for managing stress-related neuropsychiatric and gastrointestinal co-occurring disorders. Further mechanistic and translational studies are needed to validate these results and explore its clinical relevance in patients with multiple chronic conditions.

Ethical approval:

The research/study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at King George’s Medical University, UP, Lucknow, Approval No. 185/IAEC/2023/R, dated 1st April 2024.

Declaration of patient consent:

Patient’s consent not required as there are no patients in this study.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , . Stress and the gastrointestinal tract. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;20:332-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , et al. Global prevalence of mental health issues among the general population during the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2021;11:10173.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , . Depression, anxiety, and stress and socio-demographic correlates among general Indian public during COVID-19. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2020;66:756-62.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , . The effect of emotional stress and depression on the prevalence of digestive diseases. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;21:273-82.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , . Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in major depression disorder treatment: An umbrella review on systematic reviews. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2020;24:357-70.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , et al. Regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical stress response. Compr Physiol. 2016;6:603-21.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , . Multiple feedback mechanisms activating corticotropin-releasing hormone system in the brain during stress. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2002;73:147-58.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , . Fibrillar beta-amyloid peptide Abeta1-40 activates microglial proliferation via stimulating TNF-alpha release and H2O2 derived from NADPH oxidase: A cell culture study. J Neuroinflammation. 2006;3:24.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , . Oxidative stress and TNF-alpha induce histone acetylation and NFkappaB/AP-1 activation in alveolar epithelial cells: Potential mechanism in gene transcription in lung inflammation. Mol Cell Biochem 2002239-48
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , . Phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5): Structure-function regulation and therapeutic applications of inhibitors. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;134:111128.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , . Chronic inhibition of phosphodiesterase 5 with tadalafil attenuates mitochondrial dysfunction in type 2 diabetic hearts: Potential role of NO/SIRT1/PGC-1α signaling. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2014;306:H1558-68.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , . Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors: Shedding new light on the darkness of depression? J Affect Disord. 2020;264:138-49.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , . Sildenafil, an inhibitor of phosphodiesterase subtype 5, prevents indomethacin-induced small-intestinal ulceration in rats via a NO/cGMP-dependent mechanism. Dig Dis Sci. 2009;54:2346-56.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , . Established and emerging therapeutic uses of PDE type 5 inhibitors in cardiovascular disease. Br J Pharmacol. 2020;177:5467-88.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , . Identification of amino acid residues responsible for the selectivity of tadalafil binding to two closely related phosphodiesterases, PDE5 and PDE6. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:41406-16.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , . Repeated restraint stress induced neurobehavioral and sexual hormone disorders in male rats. AIMS Neurosci. 2022;9:264-76.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , . Synergistic antidepressant-and anxiolytic-like effects of harmaline along with cinanserin in acute restraint stress-treated mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2021;238:259-69.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , . Enhancing effect of IL-1, IL-17, and TNF-alpha on macrophage inflammatory protein-3alpha production in rheumatoid arthritis: Regulation by soluble receptors and Th2 cytokines. J Immunol. 2001;167:6015-20.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , . Possible protective effect of TNF-α inhibition and triad NO/cGMP/VEGF activation on gastric ulcer in rats. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2021;99:864-74.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , . Validation of chronic restraint stress model in young adult rats for the study of depression using longitudinal multimodal MR imaging. eNeuro. 2020;7:1-20.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , . Chronic treatment with the phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors sildenafil and tadalafil display anxiolytic effects in Flinders Sensitive Line rats. Metab Brain Dis. 2012;27:337-40.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , . The selective PDE5 inhibitor, sildenafil, improves object memory in Swiss mice and increases cGMP levels in hippocampal slices. Behav Brain Res. 2005;164:11-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , . Benzodiazepine pharmacology and central nervous system-mediated effects. Ochsner J. 2013;13:214-23.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , , . Gastric contractions, secretions and injury in cold restraint. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 1997;9:187-92.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. , . Oestrogen and thyroxine modulate blood flow mechanisms in tadalafil-treated Wistar rats. Int J Life Sci Rev. 2019;5:172-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , , . Validity of chronic restraint stress for modeling anhedonic-like behavior in rodents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int Med Res. 2022;50
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. , . The impact of psychological stress on immune function in the athletic population. Exerc Immunol Rev. 2001;7:5-17.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , , , . Mood disorders in inflammatory bowel disease: Relation to diagnosis, disease activity, perceived stress, and other factors. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012;18:2301-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections

Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology

Copyright Form


Title of the Manuscript: ________________________________________


I/We certify that I/we have participated sufficiently in the intellectual content, conception, and design of this work, or the analysis and interpretation of the data (when applicable), as well as the writing of the manuscript, to take public responsibility for it. I/We agree to have my/our name(s) listed as contributors and confirm that the manuscript represents valid work.

Each author confirms they meet the criteria for authorship as established by the ICMJE. Neither this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content under my/our authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere, except as described in the covering letter.

I/We certify that all data collected during the study is presented in this manuscript and that no data from the study has been or will be published separately. I/We agree to provide, upon request by the editors, any data/information on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees.

I/We have disclosed all financial interests, direct or indirect, that exist or may be perceived to exist for individual contributors in connection with the content of this manuscript in the cover letter. Sources of outside support for the project are also disclosed in the cover letter.

In accordance with open access principles, I/we grant the Journal the exclusive right to publish and distribute this work under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA) license. This license permits others to distribute, transform, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for non-commercial purposes, provided appropriate credit is given to the creator(s). Any adaptations must be shared under the same license terms. The key elements of the CC BY-NC-SA license are:

  • BY: Credit must be given to the original creator(s).
  • NC: Only non-commercial uses of the work are permitted.
  • SA: Adaptations must be shared under the same license terms.

I/We retain academic rights to the material, and the Journal is authorized to:

  1. Grant permission to republish the article in whole or in part, with or without fee.
  2. Produce preprints or reprints and translate the work into other languages for sale or free distribution.
  3. Republish the work in a collection of articles in any mechanical or electronic format.

I/We give the rights to the corresponding author to make necessary changes as requested by the Journal, handle all correspondence on our behalf, and act as the guarantor for the manuscript.

All individuals who have made substantial contributions to the work but do not meet the criteria for authorship are named in the Acknowledgment section with their written permission. If no acknowledgment is provided, it signifies that no substantial contributions were made by non-authors.


Name of the author(s) Signature Date signed Corresponding author?
Yes/No
Yes/No
Yes/No