Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case series
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Media and News
Medial Education
Medical Education
Obituary
Opinion Article
Original Article
Review Article
Short Communication
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case series
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Media and News
Medial Education
Medical Education
Obituary
Opinion Article
Original Article
Review Article
Short Communication
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case series
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Media and News
Medial Education
Medical Education
Obituary
Opinion Article
Original Article
Review Article
Short Communication
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/IJPP_291_2023

Targeting of adenylate cyclase and protein kinase A: An advanced concept of Alzheimer’s disease pharmacotherapy

Goldberg Research Institute of Pharmacology and Regenerative Medicine, Tomsk National Research Medical Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russian Federation.

*Corresponding author: Gleb Zyuz`kov, Goldberg Research Institute of Pharmacology and Regenerative Medicine, Tomsk National Research Medical Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russian Federation. zgn@rambler.ru

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Zyuz`kov G, Miroshnichenko L, Kotlovskaya LY, Chayikovskyi A. Targeting of adenylate cyclase and protein kinase A: An advanced concept of the Alzheimer’s disease pharmacotherapy. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. doi: 10.25259/IJPP_291_2023

Abstract

Objectives:

The extremely low efficiency of existing methods of treating Alzheimer’s disease (AD) makes it highly relevant to develop fundamentally new drugs for its therapy. It is advisable to create drugs that stimulate neurodegeneration. As part of the implementation of this route, it is promising for the identification of targets from numerous intracellular signalling molecules, including Cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)-dependent intracellular pathways. The work objective was to explore the potential of regulating the brain regeneration-competent cells (progenitors and neurogliacytes of various types) using the adenylate cyclase and protein kinase A blockers under conditions of the neurotoxic effects of beta-amyloid in vitro.

Materials and Methods:

The C57BL/6 mice were used. The functioning of neural stem cells (NSCs), neuronal committed progenitor (NCP) cells and neurogliocytes of the subventricular zone of the brain under the influence of blockers of adenylate cyclase (Chemical Abstracts Service [CAS] number 6698-26-6) and protein kinase A (CAS 108068-98-0) was studied. NCP, astrocytes, oligodendrocytes and microgliacytes were obtained from neural tissue using immunomagnetic sorting.

Results:

We revealed the discoordination of the activity of NSC and NCP under the action of neurotoxic b-amyloid. The ability of the adenylate cyclase and protein kinase A blockers to synchronise the implementation of the progenitors’ functions when exposed to beta-amyloid was found. The blockade of cAMP-dependent pathways on exposure to a neurotoxic agent also enhanced the secretion of stimulatory neural progenitors by several types of neurogliocytes. Particularly pronounced was the reaction of oligodendrocytes and microglial cells during protein kinase A inactivation.

Conclusion:

The results show the potential of coordinated stimulation of the functions of different progenitors and neurogliocytes using selective inhibitors of intracellular molecules of cAMP-dependent pathways (primarily protein kinase A) in Alzheimer’s dementia.

Keywords

Adenylate cyclase
Alzheimer’s dementia
Neurogenesis
Protein kinase A
Regeneration-competent cells

INTRODUCTION

The spread of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is now reaching epidemic levels, and (for unknown reasons) to a greater extent in economically more developed countries.[1] At the same time, the onset of the disease occurs at an increasingly earlier age, and the rate of progression of its pathological manifestations steadily increases. To treat it today, medicines that affect neurons are used. However, they are not effective and cannot stop the process of neurodegeneration.[2,3] AD aetiology is not completely clear,[1,4,5] but many parts of its pathogenesis are known. In particular, the role of pathogenic beta-amyloid fragments in damaging nerve cells is well known.[5-7] It was found that dysfunction of neurons, their necrosis and apoptosis under conditions of exposure to amyloid aggregates occur with the loss of neuroplasticity and neurogenesis.[5,8,9]

Our previous studies have shown that neurogenesis disorders in AD develop against the background of uncoupling of the mitotic ability and specialisation processes of neural stem cells (NSCs) and the neurogliocyte neurotrophin-secreting function.[10,11]

Based on this, the development of anti-AD drugs that coordinate the activity of cells involved in brain regeneration (NSC, neuronal committed progenitor (NCP) cells and neurogliocytes) looks promising.[5,10] The development of this direction seems preferable through the concept of control of intracellular signalling in cells involved in regeneration (CIR).[3,12-15] The effectiveness of selective action is determined by the specificity of signal transmission in the precursors of different tissues and/or the presence of unique isoforms in them.[3,16] The most important stages in the development of this concept of AD treatment are the identification of specific signalling molecules that can radically influence the activity of RCC. The most important stage in the development of this strategy is the pinpointing of specific ‘targets’ that can radically influence the activity of CIR.

It is well known that cAMP largely controls the functions of NSCs and neurogliocytes, including in some types of nervous tissue degeneration.[12,17-19] However, the significance of individual protein-protein interactions within this signalling for the functioning of NSC and a number of other neural CIR involved in neuroregeneration in AD is still unknown.

The work objective was to explore the potential of regulating the CIR brain (NSC, NCP, astrocytes, oligodendrocytes and microgliacytes) functions using the adenylate cyclase and protein kinase A blockers during the neurotoxic effects of beta-amyloid.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chemicals

Beta-amyloid 25–35 (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany); adenylate cyclase blocker (CAS 6698-26-6, Sigma-Aldrich, USA); protein kinase A blocker (CAS 108068-98-0, Sigma-Aldrich, USA); special MACSNeuroMedium; MicroBeads for immunomagnetic sorting (antibodies to polysialylated-neural cell adhesion molecule [PSA-NCAM]; antibodies to astrocyte cell surface antigen-2 [ACSA-2]; antibodies to Anti-O4; antibodies to CD11b) (Miltenyi Biotec B.V. and Co. KG, Germany); hydroxycarbamide, hydurea and dimethyl sulfoxide solution (Sigma-Aldrich, USA).

Experimental animals and study design

During the work, we were guided by the principles of humane treatment of animals. Permission was given by the Special Ethical Committee of the Tomsk National Research Medical Centre (details of protocol: GRIPhRM-2023-01/11 dated 12 January 2023). The carbon dioxide (CO2) chamber was used to kill the mice after completion of the work.

In vitro detected the influence of the adenylate cyclase (30 μM) and protein kinase A blockers (10 μM) on the NSC, NCP and the neurotrophin (humoral factors stimulating neural progenitors) secretion by astrocytes, oligodendrocytes and microgliacytes under conditions of the neurotoxic effects of beta-amyloid.[5,10] The cell cultures without beta-amyloid and with this poison without inhibitors served as controls.

Neurotoxic effects of beta-amyloid modelling

The neurotoxic effects of beta-amyloid were modelled by introducing the bA 25–35 fragment in vitro. This poison (1 mM) was first kept in saline for 7 days for protein aggregation. When culturing cells, the concentration of bA in vitro was 20 μM.[5,10]

Progenitors research

Tissue was isolated from the subventricular zone to obtain progenitors. The NSC and NCP in the cellular material were calculated by the level of colony formation in cultures of unfractionated and CD56+(PSA-NCAM+)-expressing cells, respectively. CD56+ cells were isolated by immunosorting using PSA-NCAM MicroBead.[10,15,16] After this, the progenitors were 5 days incubated in MACS Neuro Medium (105/mL) in the CO2 incubator under standard conditions (37°C, 5% CO2). NSC and NCP in the studied cellular material were assessed by colony-forming capacity (by the number of CFU consisting of at least 100 cells). The progenitor mitotic capacity was also determined. For this purpose, we used hydroxyurea (1 μM), which blocks the mitosis S-phase. In addition, the ratio of the number of cluster-forming units (by the number of cluster-forming units consisting of 30–80 cells) to CFU was determined by the NSC and NCP specialisation index (specialisation index).[5,15]

Neurogliacytes research

The astrocytes, oligodendrocytes and microgliacytes were obtained using microbeads with antibodies to ACSA-2, Anti-O4 and CD11b, respectively. The supernatants of these neuroglial cells (105/mL) were then obtained (2 days incubated under standard conditions). Based on the level of yield of spherical cell formations colony-forming units (CFU) under the influence of the resulting conditioned media, the activity stimulating neurosphere formation (neurosphere stimulating activity [NSA], the content of a complex of humoral factors stimulating neural progenitors) was determined.[5,14]

Statistical analysis

For data analysis, the Mann–Whitney test was used. The results in the article are presented as arithmetic means, and the significance level of differences is noted at P < 0.05.[20]

RESULTS

NSC and Neuronal committed progenitors (NCP) when exposed to beta-amyloid

The toxic effect of bA 25–35 on precursors was manifested in a decrease in the yield of NSC_CFU (up to 78.1% of the intact control level) and their mitotic activity [Figure 1a-c]. There was also an increase in the number of NSC_ClFU in culture with beta-amyloid (up to 138.7% of the same indicator in a medium without beta-amyloid) and the ratio of NSC_ClFU to NSC_CFU (up to 180.2%), reflecting the rate of NSC specialisation [Figure 1b]. The beta-amyloid, at the same time, stimulated the NCP mitotic activity. The yield of NCP_ CFU [Figure 2a] and their proliferation reached 351.3% and 207.9% of control values [Figure 2a-c]. At the same time, the rate of development and maturation of multipotent precursors increased (up to 187.6% of the initial level), while in unipotent precursors, it decreased significantly (to 53.3% of the control) [Figure 2d]. These findings confirmed the data on the uncoupling of NSC and NCP activities when exposed to beta-amyloid.[8,21] In addition, maladaptation of the cellular renewal system (in addition to shifts in the proliferation of precursors and decreased differentiation of NSCs) should be considered the rapid maturation of NSCs as a cause of aberrant cell development.[15,22,23]

Quantity of neural stem cells: (a) NSC_CFU, (b) NSC_ ClFU, (c) in the subventricular zone of the brain; NSC mitotic index, (d) and NSC specialization index. In Figures 1-3: Cellular culture without beta-amyloid (intact) and containing beta-amyloid (Aβ); blue columns – cellular culture without blockers of signaling molecules; red columns – cellular culture with the adenylate cyclase blocker; green columns – cellular culture with the protein kinase A blocker; P < 0.05 compared with: *: Cells in the medium without Aβ, #: Cells in the medium without molecule blockers.
Figure 1:
Quantity of neural stem cells: (a) NSC_CFU, (b) NSC_ ClFU, (c) in the subventricular zone of the brain; NSC mitotic index, (d) and NSC specialization index. In Figures 1-3: Cellular culture without beta-amyloid (intact) and containing beta-amyloid (Aβ); blue columns – cellular culture without blockers of signaling molecules; red columns – cellular culture with the adenylate cyclase blocker; green columns – cellular culture with the protein kinase A blocker; P < 0.05 compared with: *: Cells in the medium without Aβ, #: Cells in the medium without molecule blockers.
Quantity of neuronal committed progenitors: (a) NCP_ CFU, (b) NCP_ClFU, (c) in the subventricular zone of the brain; NCP mitotic index (d) and NCP specialization index; blue columns – cellular culture without blockers of signaling molecules; red columns – cellular culture with the adenylate cyclase blocker; green columns – cellular culture with the protein kinase A blocker; P < 0.05 compared with: *: Cells in the medium without Aβ, #: Cells in the medium without molecule blockers.
Figure 2:
Quantity of neuronal committed progenitors: (a) NCP_ CFU, (b) NCP_ClFU, (c) in the subventricular zone of the brain; NCP mitotic index (d) and NCP specialization index; blue columns – cellular culture without blockers of signaling molecules; red columns – cellular culture with the adenylate cyclase blocker; green columns – cellular culture with the protein kinase A blocker; P < 0.05 compared with: *: Cells in the medium without Aβ, #: Cells in the medium without molecule blockers.

Functioning of neurogliacytes under the beta-amyloid influence

The neurotoxic beta-amyloid stimulated the production of neurotrophic humoral factors by astrocytes and microgliocytes (up to 207.3% and 126.2% of control values–medium without a toxic agent). Oligodendrocyte function was not affected by beta-amyloid [Figure 3a-c].

Conditioned media neurosphere stimulating activity (NSA) of neurogliacytes expressing of (a) astrocyte cell surface antigen-2 (ACSA-2), (b) O4, (c) and CD11b.
Figure 3:
Conditioned media neurosphere stimulating activity (NSA) of neurogliacytes expressing of (a) astrocyte cell surface antigen-2 (ACSA-2), (b) O4, (c) and CD11b.

It is important to remember that changes in the NSA of supernatants were an indicator integrating the secretion of both stimulators of precursors and inhibitors of their functions, such as proinflammatory cytokines.[24-26] There is evidence that beta-amyloid causes a pathologically excessive inflammatory response and is a pathogenic factor in senile dementia.[2,4]

Effect of the signalling molecule blockers on the NSC functioning

The research into the cAMP role in the neuronal progenitor functioning has revealed interesting patterns. The blockers of adenylate cyclase and protein kinase A in cell cultures (both in the presence of beta-amyloid and without it) caused an intensification of progenitor mitosis. The changes in cell culture with beta-amyloid were very pronounced. At the same time, the yield of NSC_CFU was 246.4% and 242.5% of the control (medium with beta-amyloid without inhibitors) when using inhibitors of adenylate cyclase and protein kinase A, respectively [Figure 1a]. The achieved values of this indicator in this case exceeded those in the medium without beta-amyloid. Similar changes were observed in relation to the mitotic activity of NSC [Figure 1c]. Besides, in all cases, there was a decrease in the progenitors’ specialisation index. Under conditions of modelling the pathological process, the decrease in the intensity of NSC specialisation was 46.4% and 37.7% when exposed to adenylate cyclase and protein kinase A blockers, respectively [Figure 1d]. This should be considered a factor in improving the processes of neurogenesis by inhibiting aberrant cell development.[10,14]

Thus, the selective blockade of both signalling molecules stimulated mitosis of multipotent NSCs. Moreover, under conditions of neurotoxic exposure to beta-amyloid, these changes were most pronounced.

Effect of the signalling molecule blockers on the NCP functioning

When studying the influence of adenylate cyclase and protein kinase A blockers on the functions of committed precursors, other regularities were revealed. The impaired cAMP synthesis did not affect the studied NCP parameters, regardless of the neurotoxin content in the culture medium. However, NCP reacted to the protein kinase A blocker. Moreover, in the beta-amyloid-free medium, the amount of NCP_CFU and their mitotic activity in this case decreased (up to 56.4% and 78.3% of the controls) [Figure 2]. Their maturation accelerated (up to 179.1% of the initial level). Under conditions of neurodegeneration modelling, the NCP response to the protein kinase A inhibitor was different. The blockade of this signalling molecule caused an increase in the yield of NCP_CFU (up to 123.5%) and in the rate of their mitosis (up to 131.7%). At the same time, a decrease in the rate of their specialised development was detected to 74.9% of the control (medium with beta-amyloid) [Figure 2d].

It turns out that the reaction of committed precursors to the protein kinase A blocker was determined by the cultivation conditions. Moreover, when modelling neurodegeneration, this poison activated their growth activity.

Effect of the signalling molecule blockers on neurogliacytes functioning

The experiments have shown the different effects of selective adenylate cyclase and protein kinase A blockers on the neurogliocyte functions. The violation of cAMP synthesis and inactivation of protein kinase A in astrocytes did not change the NSA of their supernatants obtained from cells both in the medium with beta-amyloid and without beta-amyloid [Figure 3a]. The blockade of adenylate cyclase and protein kinase A in oligodendrocytes and microgliocytes caused a marked increase in NSA in conditioned media (both in cell cultures with and without Ab) [Figure 3b and c]. The levels of humoral stimulators of progenitor functions in supernatants from oligodendrocytes and microgliocytes during blockade of adenylate cyclase and protein kinase A under intact conditions reached 183.2% and 158.7%, and 201.4% and 149.2%, respectively. The neurodegeneration modelling somewhat reduced the intensity of stimulation of neurotrophin production by O4+ cells and, conversely, significantly increased it in CD11b+ cells in response to the adenylate cyclase and protein kinase A inactivation [Figure 3].

Thus, disruption of cAMP synthesis, as well as inactivation of protein kinase A, stimulated oligodendrocytes and microgliocytes, including under conditions of the neurotoxic effect of beta-amyloid.

DISCUSSION

The findings confirm the data on discoordination of multipotent and unipotent progenitor cells under the neurotoxic effects of beta-amyloid conditions.[5,10,11,27] Inhibition of the proliferative activity of NSC with an increase in that of NCP was revealed. The intensification of the specialised development of NSC increased, while in committed precursors, on the contrary, it decreased. In addition, it is important that these various changes in the mitotic activity of progenitors were recorded when the coupling of their processes of proliferation and specialisation was disrupted. At the same time, the detected extremely rapid differentiation of NSCs is likely the cause of the aberrant development of nerve cells due to beta-amyloid.[15,22,23] These phenomena of the response of the brain cellular renewal system to a neurotoxic agent will necessarily affect the effectiveness of neuroregeneration in AD.[28,29] Simultaneously, the contribution of individual types of neurogliacytes to the development of the detected discoordination of the functions of NSC and NCP remains unclear.[14,30,31] It is possible that the increase in the secretion of humoral stimulants by astrocytes and microgliocytes under the influence of the neurotoxin is excessive (including the reason for the high intensity of NSC specialisation). In this case, their reaction is decompensatory and is involved in the dysregulation of the cell renewal system.[30,32] In addition, hyperproduction of tau proteins, disadaptation of the cholinergic system and many other changes in the homeostasis of nervous tissue during the development of dementia [33,34] will only enhance and aggravate dysregeneration. Based on this, the development of a pharmacological concept for synchronising the activity of various types of CIR seems to be a very attractive method for stimulating neuroregeneration and neuroplatinity in AD.

At the same time, it has been established that cAMP (including through protein kinase A) under the influence of a specific neurotoxin further inhibits the progression of the NSC cell cycle and activates their development. However, only protein kinase A-dependent signalling plays a role in the new pattern of NCP function. It is likely that these changes in signal transduction in precursors under the influence of beta-amyloid represent a key mechanism for maladaptation of the cellular renewal system of the brain in AD.[17,18,35]

Furthermore, the experimental results demonstrate the unique prospect of coordinating the progenitor functioning by targeting cAMP-dependent pathways.[10,12] Stimulation of NSC proliferation and the coupling of this process with their specialisation under the influence of adenylate cyclase and protein kinase A blockers has been demonstrated [Figures 4 and 5]. But with regard to NCP, the PKA inhibitor turned out to be the most acceptable corrector.It is also important that this targeting of signal transduction, based on the study data, does not cause a negative impact on the secretory function of neurogliocytes. Inactivation of adenylate cyclase and protein kinase A somewhat reduced the severity of the neurotrophin production ability of oligodendrocytes (which, as noted earlier, could be excessive) and, on the contrary, significantly increased the supernatant NSA from microglial cells (apparently due to blockade of the secretion of pathogenic proinflammatory cytokines).[1,25,26]

Synchronisation of cells involved in regeneration activity under the influence of the adenylate cyclase blocker under conditions of the neurotoxic effects of beta-amyloid. Figures 4 and 5: Uninterrupted lines are activation; broken lines are inhibition; broad blue arrows are the neurotrophic effects of neurogliocytes and broad red arrows are the activating effect of signal molecule blockers. AC: Adenylate cyclase, NSC: Neural stem cells, NCP: Neuronal committed progenitors
Figure 4:
Synchronisation of cells involved in regeneration activity under the influence of the adenylate cyclase blocker under conditions of the neurotoxic effects of beta-amyloid. Figures 4 and 5: Uninterrupted lines are activation; broken lines are inhibition; broad blue arrows are the neurotrophic effects of neurogliocytes and broad red arrows are the activating effect of signal molecule blockers. AC: Adenylate cyclase, NSC: Neural stem cells, NCP: Neuronal committed progenitors
Synchronisation of cells involved in regeneration activity by the protein kinase A blocker under conditions of the neurotoxic effects of beta-amyloid. NSC: Neural stem cells, NCP: Neuronal committed progenitors, PKA: Protein kinase A
Figure 5:
Synchronisation of cells involved in regeneration activity by the protein kinase A blocker under conditions of the neurotoxic effects of beta-amyloid. NSC: Neural stem cells, NCP: Neuronal committed progenitors, PKA: Protein kinase A

CONCLUSION

The results obtained give grounds to consider the development of an advanced concept for the pharmacotherapy of AD using adenylate cyclase and protein kinase A blockers promising. However, based on these experiments, PKA is a more promising target for potentially fundamentally novel medicines.

Acknowledgments:

The authors thank the administration of the Tomsk National Research Medical Centre for the comprehensive support of the team.

Authors’ contributions:

GZ: Concept, methodologists, article writing; LM, LYK, AC: Animal work and data set.

Ethics approval:

The research/study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the local ethics committee of the Institute (Goldberg Research Institute of Pharmacology and Regenerative Medicine, Tomsk National Research Medical Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences), approva number protocol GRIPhRM-2022-03/11, dated 12th January 2023.

Declaration of patient consent:

Patient’s consent was not required as there are no patients in this study.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: The investigation was conducted with a grant from the Russian Science Foundation grant no. 22-25-00069, https://rscf.ru/project/22-25-00069/.

References

  1. , , , , , , et al. Alzheimer's disease. Lancet. 2021;397:1577-90.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , . Current strategies and novel drug approaches for alzheimer disease. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2020;19:676-90.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. . Targeted regulation of intracellular signal transduction in regeneration-competent cells: A new direction for therapy in regenerative medicine. Biointerface Res Appl Chem. 2021;11:12238-51.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . Amyloidosis in Alzheimer's disease: Pathogeny, etiology, and related therapeutic directions. Molecules. 2022;27:1210.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , . NF-кB: A target for synchronizing the functioning nervous tissue progenitors of different types in Alzheimer's disease. Curr Mol Pharmacol. 2022;16:234-41.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , . Neural stem cells in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: Current status, challenges, and future prospects. J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;94:S173-86.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , . Stem cell therapy for Alzheimer's disease. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1266:39-55.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , . Amyloid-b oligomers-induced mitochondrial DNA repair impairment contributes to altered human neural stem cell differentiation. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2019;16:934-49.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , . Failure of Alzheimer's mice brain resident neural precursor cells in supporting microglia-mediated amyloid b clearance. Cells. 2022;11:876.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , . Functional state of various types of regenerative-competent neural tissue cells in b-amyloid-induced neurodegeneration. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2022;173:709-13.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , . The role of MARK ERK1/2 and p38 in regulation of functions of neural stem cells and neuroglia under conditions of b-amyloid-induced neurodegeneration. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2022;173:424-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , . Targeting cAMP-pathway in regeneration-competent cells of nervous tissue: Potential to create a novel drug for treatment of ethanol-induced neurodegeneration. Cent Nerv Syst Agents Med Chem. 2021;21:172-80.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , . Prospects for the use of NF-kb inhibitors to stimulate the functions of regeneration-competent cells of nerve tissue and neuroregeneration in ethanol-induced neurodegeneration. Biointerface Res Appl Chem. 2021;11:8065-74.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , et al. The role of JAK and STAT3 in regulation of secretory function of neuroglial Cells of different types in ethanol-induced neurodegeneration. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2022;172:686-90.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , . Neuroprotective and neuroregenerative effects of shikonin-mediated inhibition of NF-kB/Stat3 in alcoholic encephalopathy. Lett Drug Des Discov. 2023;20:2045-54.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , et al. Specific features of intracellular signal transduction in the regulation of functions of neural stem cells and committed neuronal progenitors. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2021;170:522-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , . CAMP compartmentalization in cerebrovascular endothelial cells: New therapeutic opportunities in Alzheimer's disease. Cells. 2021;10:1951.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , . Inhibition of adenylate cyclase of regeneration competent cells of nervous tissue: A novel approach for the treatment of alcoholic encephalopathy. Biointerface Res Appl Chem. 2022;12:1547-60.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , , et al. Multifaceted roles of cAMP signaling in the repair process of spinal cord injury and related combination treatments. Front Mol Neurosci. 2022;15:808510.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , et al. Experimental design and analysis and their reporting: New guidance for publication in BJP. Br J Pharmacol. 2015;172:3461-71.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , . Physiological and pathological effects of amyloid-b species in neural stem cell biology. Neural Regen Res. 2019;14:2035-42.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , , et al. Aberrant induction of a mesenchymal/stem cell program engages senescence in normal mammary epithelial cells. Mol Cancer Res. 2021;19:651-66.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , . Aberrant interactions between amyloid-beta and alpha5 laminins as possible driver of neuronal disfunction in Alzheimer's disease. Biochimie. 2020;174:44-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , . Nanomaterials enhance the immunomodulatory effect of molecular targeted therapy. Int J Nanomedicine. 2021;16:1631-61.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , . Inflammation drives Alzheimer's disease: Emphasis on 5-lipoxygenase pathways. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2021;19:885-95.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. , , . Design and synthesis of new indole drug candidates to treat Alzheimer's disease and targeting neuro-inflammation using a multi-target-directed ligand (MTDL) strategy. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2022;37:2660-78.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , . Prospect of using ERK1/2 and p38 in regeneration-competent cells of nervous tissue as a drug targets for treating Alzheimer's disease. Biointerface Res Appl Chem. 2023;13:166.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , , , . The next step of neurogenesis in the context of Alzheimer's disease. Mol Biol Rep. 2021;48:5647-60.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. , , . Graphene-based materials for efficient neurogenesis. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2022;1351:43-64.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. , , . The role of microglia in sporadic Alzheimer's Disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;79:961-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , , , , et al. GLP-1 improves the neuronal supportive ability of astrocytes in Alzheimer's disease by regulating mitochondrial dysfunction via the cAMP/PKA pathway. Biochem Pharmacol. 2021;188:114578.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. , , , . Astrogliosis: An integral player in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. Prog Neurobiol. 2016;144:121-41.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. , , , . Acetylcholinesterase enzyme inhibitor molecules with therapeutic potential for Alzheimer's disease. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2022;21:427-49.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. , , . A current view on tau protein phosphorylation in Alzheimer's disease. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2021;69:131-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. , , . Diabetic theory in anti-Alzheimer's drug research and development. Part 2: Therapeutic potential of cAMP-specific phosphodiesterase inhibitors. Curr Med Chem. 2021;28:3535-53.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections

Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology

Copyright Form


Title of the Manuscript: ________________________________________


I/We certify that I/we have participated sufficiently in the intellectual content, conception, and design of this work, or the analysis and interpretation of the data (when applicable), as well as the writing of the manuscript, to take public responsibility for it. I/We agree to have my/our name(s) listed as contributors and confirm that the manuscript represents valid work.

Each author confirms they meet the criteria for authorship as established by the ICMJE. Neither this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content under my/our authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere, except as described in the covering letter.

I/We certify that all data collected during the study is presented in this manuscript and that no data from the study has been or will be published separately. I/We agree to provide, upon request by the editors, any data/information on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees.

I/We have disclosed all financial interests, direct or indirect, that exist or may be perceived to exist for individual contributors in connection with the content of this manuscript in the cover letter. Sources of outside support for the project are also disclosed in the cover letter.

In accordance with open access principles, I/we grant the Journal the exclusive right to publish and distribute this work under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA) license. This license permits others to distribute, transform, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for non-commercial purposes, provided appropriate credit is given to the creator(s). Any adaptations must be shared under the same license terms. The key elements of the CC BY-NC-SA license are:

  • BY: Credit must be given to the original creator(s).
  • NC: Only non-commercial uses of the work are permitted.
  • SA: Adaptations must be shared under the same license terms.

I/We retain academic rights to the material, and the Journal is authorized to:

  1. Grant permission to republish the article in whole or in part, with or without fee.
  2. Produce preprints or reprints and translate the work into other languages for sale or free distribution.
  3. Republish the work in a collection of articles in any mechanical or electronic format.

I/We give the rights to the corresponding author to make necessary changes as requested by the Journal, handle all correspondence on our behalf, and act as the guarantor for the manuscript.

All individuals who have made substantial contributions to the work but do not meet the criteria for authorship are named in the Acknowledgment section with their written permission. If no acknowledgment is provided, it signifies that no substantial contributions were made by non-authors.


Name of the author(s) Signature Date signed Corresponding author?
Yes/No
Yes/No
Yes/No