Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Media and News
Medial Education
Medical Education
Obituary
Opinion Article
Original Article
Review Article
Short Communication
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Media and News
Medial Education
Medical Education
Obituary
Opinion Article
Original Article
Review Article
Short Communication
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Media and News
Medial Education
Medical Education
Obituary
Opinion Article
Original Article
Review Article
Short Communication
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
64 (
2
); 109-117
doi:
10.25259/IJPP_103_2020

Age group and gender-wise comparison of obesity indices in subjects of Varanasi

, ,
1Departments of Physiology and Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
2Departments of Biophysics, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.

*Corresponding author: Kumar Sarvottam, Department of Physiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi - 221 005, Uttar Pradesh, India. kumarsarvo@gmail.com

Received: , Accepted: ,
© 2020 Published by Scientific Scholar on behalf of Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology
Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Sarvottam K, Ranjan P, Yadav U. Age group and gender-wise comparison of obesity indices in subjects of Varanasi. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 2020:64(2):109-17.

Abstract

Objectives:

Deposition of body fat may differ in different age groups and gender-wise differences are also likely. The present study aims to evaluate age- and gender-wise differences in obesity parameters in healthy subjects of both genders of Varanasi.

Materials and Methods:

Anthropometric measurements were performed in 346 subjects reported in health check-up camp. Parameters were compared between each age group for males and females separately as well as gender-wise comparison for each age group was also performed. Regression analysis was performed to observe the relationship of age with obesity parameters and body mass index (BMI) with other parameters of obesity.

Results:

Both males and females had central obesity with males having higher waist circumference (WC) than females (P = 0.002) while females had higher body fat (fat %) (P = 0.000). Obesity indices of males of age group of 18–29 years were lesser as compared to other age groups. Obesity indices of female subjects were comparable in 18–39 years of age. Age group of 30–39 and 50–59 years males had higher WC than females (P = 0.002, 0.016, respectively) while fat % of females in each age group were significantly higher than males of corresponding age groups. Positive correlation of age with obesity parameters and BMI with WC and fat % was observed.

Conclusion:

Gender-wise differences in BMI, WC, WHtR and fat % tend to increase with age, indicative of increase in adiposity and central obesity with progressing age. Males in general have higher WC than females but lesser fat %. Gender differences in obesity may show age group specific variations. Findings of the study may be useful for identifying age specific distribution of obesity indices in males and females.

Keywords

Age and obesity
Anthropometric measurements
Central obesity
Gender and obesity
Indian cutoffs of obesity
Obesity

INTRODUCTION

The obesity is an abnormal and excessive accumulation of fat, which may impair health.[1] India contributes a substantial proportion of obese/overweight population, according to ICMR- INDIAB study, 2015 approximately 135 million people suffer from obesity.[2] Age, gender and genetic susceptibility are important non-modifiable risk factors of obesity.[3] Apart from genetics, poor maternal nutrition induces the foetus to reduce metabolic capacities of vital organs such as pancreas, liver and kidney.[4] On exposure to availability of dense calorie food in later life leads to storage of fat and other metabolic compensations.[5] Nutrition transition from staple food to westernised diet, carbohydrate rich diet and decreased physical activity are some other important contributors of fat deposition.[6] Thus, due to low metabolic capacity resulting from low-birth weight and imposed high metabolic load, Indians are more at risk of developing obesity related metabolic dysregulations at lesser body mass index (BMI) and they tend to possess higher body fat (fat %) as compared with western counterparts;[5] hence, obesity cutoffs have been redefined for Indian population.[7]

Age and gender are important non-modifiable determinants of fat accumulation.[8] Body weight and fat mass increase with increasing age in early and middle adulthood and may decrease in old age.[9] Fat mass correlate positively with age while lean body mass and fat-free mass (FFM %) correlate negatively with age in adults aged more than 50 years.[10] FFM % tends to increase with age in younger individuals.[11] Rapid decline in lean mass with age is more marked in females of peri-menopausal and younger age in comparison to males in all age while increase in fat mass with age has been observed in both genders.[12] Visceral fat tend to increase throughout the life irrespective of gender.[8] Waist circumference (WC), which is an indicator of abdominal adiposity and an independent predictor of cardio-metabolic diseases,[13] increases with ageing.[8] Men have higher WC compared to women of same age[14] but women show greater increase in WC with age.[8] Change in obesity indices and its correlation with age and gender have been documented earlier but only few studies have used Indian cutoffs of obesity for comparison of anthropometric parameters in different age groups of both genders[2] and most studies either restricted to one gender and have not excluded other comorbid conditions or morbid obesity.[2,15]

Hence, in this paper, we explored age-wise differences in obesity parameters of male and female subjects separately. We also investigated gender-wise differences of each age group in subjects using BMI cutoffs of obesity for Indians. This study might prove useful in identification of the age of progression of obesity in both genders, and for planning of further studies aiming to administer lifestyle modifications in obesity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants aged 18 years or more were recruited for anthropometric assessment after taking informed written consent. Otherwise healthy lean, overweight and obese subjects of both genders based on BMI cutoffs of obesity[7] were included in the study. Morbid obesity is often associated with other metabolic complications and immobility,[16] metabolic complications or their treatment itself may alter the progression of obesity.[17] We wanted to recruit otherwise healthy overweight and obese subjects so, morbid obese subjects (BMI ≥35 kg/m2),[7] individuals having history of diabetes, peripheral arterial disease, cardiovascular disease, hypertension or other chronic diseases, any history of prolonged hospitalisation and immobility were excluded from the study.

Body weight was measured by digital weighing machine (Omron digital body weight scale HN-283) to the nearest 0.1 kg. Subjects were wearing light clothing with no footwear. Subjects were instructed to stand straight to the foot bar; legs were positioned to each side of digital scale.[14] Self-reported weight was not used in the data. Height was measured by stadiometer with movable head piece (PIPER stature meter – 2 m) to the nearest 0.1 cm. Subjects were asked to stand straight with heels, buttocks, shoulders blades and occiput touching the vertical back stand with both the arms loosely hanging by side. The headpiece was pressed sufficiently over the hairs.[18] BMI was calculated by Quetelet’s formula i.e., weight (kg) divided by height (m2).[18] Mid abdominal WC was measured by measuring tape (Anthroflex-2 m) placed between iliac crest and lower rib margin.[19] For measurement, patients were made to stand straight with arms on contralateral side.[19] Waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) was calculated by dividing WC (cm) by height (cm).[20] Skinfold thickness (SFT) was measured precisely from the right side of the body at various sites, namely triceps, biceps, subscapular and suprailiac regions by with the help of skinfold calliper (Slimguide skinfold calliper C-120 B). At the triceps, SFT was measured on the midline of the back of the arm at the mid-point level between the acromion process and the tip of the olecranon process. Biceps SFT was measured over the biceps at the same level as the midpoint for the triceps. Subscapular SFT was measured below the inferior angle of the scapula at an angle of 45° to the spine. Suprailiac SFT was measured in the mid-axillary line above the crest of the ilium.[21] SFT chart for age and gender was used for calculation of fat %.[22] FFM% was calculated as 100 – fat%.[23] Study was approved from the Institute Ethical Committee (No. dean/2016-17/EC/737, dated: 31-03-2017) and ethical standards of Helsinki Declaration were followed while performing all the measurements.

For statistical comparison subjects of each gender were classified into five age groups of around 10 years interval: Group 1 (18–29 years), Group 2 (30–39 years), Group 3 (40– 49 years), Group 4 (50–59 years) and Group 5 (≥ 60 years). IBM SPSS version 22 was used for all statistical analysis. Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used for testing the normal distribution of the data. Polynomial (cubic) regression analysis was performed to check relationship of different parameters as it had best curve fit and highest correlation coefficient as compared other models of regression. WC, WHtR and fat % were compared with their respective cutoffs using one sample t-test. Independent sample t-test was used to compare anthropometric parameters of male and female participants and also to compare parameters of individual age groups of both genders. Age group wise comparisons of anthropometric parameters of each gender were done by one-way ANOVA and Turkey HSD post hoc test was used to measure differences among individual groups. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant value.

RESULTS

Total 346 subjects participated in the study, out of those all parameters could be recorded for 283 subjects (Males = 198 and Females = 85) of age 40.95 ± 16.02 years (Mean ± SD). Subjects of both genders were categorised in five groups of approximately 10 years interval. Data of both genders were analysed for all parameters for different age groups.

Polynomial (cubic) regression analysis was performed to check the relationship of anthropometric parameters with age and BMI with WC, fat % and WHtR. Significant correlations of age were observed with BMI (r2 = 0.201, P = 0.000), WC (r2 = 0.214, P = 0.000) and fat % (r2 = 0.268, P = 0.000) but not with WHtR (r2 = 0.009, P = 0.386). BMI significantly correlated with WC (r2 = 0.561, P = 0.000), fat % (r2 = 0.271, P = 0.000) and WHtR (r2 = 0.047, P = 0.01). Similar results were obtained when regression analysis was performed in males and females separately. Among males age had significant correlation with BMI (r2 = 0.261, P = 0.000), WC (r2 = 0.243, P = 0.000) and fat % (r2 = 0.304, P = 0.000). BMI had significant correlations with WC (r2= 0.657, P = 0.000) and fat % (r2= 0.322, P = 0.000). No significant correlation was found between age and WHtR (r2= 0.001, P = 0.410) or BMI and WHtR (r2= 0.046, P = 0.000) in males. Significant correlations of age with BMI (r2 = 0.261, P = 0.000), WC (r2 = 0.243, P = 0.000), fat % (r2 = 0.304, P = 0.000) and WHtR (r2 = 0.275, P = 0.000) were observed in females. BMI was found to correlate significantly with WC (r2 = 0.659, P = 0.000), fat % (r2= 0.459, P = 0.000) and WHtR (r2 = 0.672, P = 0.01) in females.

To check, whether subjects were centrally obese or not, WC of male and female participants was compared from their respective cutoff values of obesity (85 cm for male and 80 cm for females) for Indian population.[24] WC of both genders was found significantly higher than their respective cutoffs [Table 1]. Total 137 of 198 males had WC equal or higher than cutoff value for men while 61 out of 85 females had WC equal or higher than their respective cutoff. Similarly, WHtR in both genders and fat % of female participants was higher than their respective cutoffs of obesity,[23] while fat % in males were found lower than cutoffs, [Table 1]. WHtR of 58 out of 85 females and fat % of 54 out of 85 females had higher values than their respective cutoffs while WHtR of 141 of 198 males and fat % of 80 out of 198 males had higher values than their respective cutoffs.

Table 1: Comparison of WC, WHtR and fat % with obesity cutoffs.
Parameters Gender Mean±SD t-value Pvalue 95% confidence interval of the difference
WC M 90.21±12.77 6.040 0.000* 3.673 7.230
WHtR M 0.53±0.07 6.721 0.000* 0.026 0.488
fat % M 22.79±6.63 −0.467 0.000* −3.136 −2.170
WC F 85.21±11.92 4.055 0.000* 2.658 7.772
WHtR F 0.55±0.08 3.671 0.000* 0.014 0.048
fat % F 30.44±5.70 0.715 0.000* −7.787 −1.671
*represents P≤0.05, M: Male participants, F: Female participants, test applied-one sample T test, cutoff values for WC (M)=85 cms, F=80 cms, WHtR (M)=0.5, F=0.52 and fat % (M)=25%, F=30%.

Gender-wise comparison of age and anthropometric parameters resulted in males having higher WC than females (P = 0.002) while females had higher fat % than males (P = 0.000), [Table 2]. Gender-wise comparison of parameters in each age group reveals that BMI and WHtR were not significantly different for males and females. Groups 2 and 4 males had higher WC than females (P = 0.002, 0.016 respectively) [Table 3], while fat % of females were significantly higher than males of all age groups [Table 4].

Table 2: Gender-wise comparison of anthropometric parameters.
Parameters Gender Mean±SD Pvalue 95% confidence interval of the difference
Age (Years) M 41.25±16.66 0.589 −4.800 2.728
F 40.21±14.34
Weight (kg) M 67.50±12.35 0.000* −11.335 −5.713
F 58.97±10.98
BMI (kg/m2) M 23.94±4.01 0.056 −0.267 1.952
F 24.90±4.66
WC (cms) M 90.21±12.77 0.002* −8.169 −1.818
F 85.21±11.92
WHtR M 0.53±0.07 0.062 −0.002 0.098
F 0.55±0.08
fat % M 22.79±6.63 0.000* 6.022 9.275
F 30.44±5.70
FFM % M 77.20±6.65 0.000* 6.016 9.275
F 69.56±5.70
*represents P<0.05, M: Male participants, F: Female participants, Test applied-Independent sample t test
Table 3: Gender-wise comparison of WC in each age group.
WC (cm)
Age group (Years) Gender Mean±SD P-value 95% confidence interval of the difference
18–29 M 82.58±9.19 0.148 −1.143 7.497
F 79.40±10.03
30–39 M 91.99±7.78 0.002* 3.645 14.681
F 82.82±12.24
40–49 M 96.89±10.14 0.016* 1.608 14.780
F 88.70±13.65
50–59 M 99.52±19.39 0.243 −5.172 19.670
F 92.27±7.66
Above 60 M 91.99±11.41 0.389 −4.411 11.111
F 88.64±10.53
*Represents P<0.05, M: Male participants, F: Female participants, Test applied-Independent sample t test
Table 4: Gender-wise comparison of fat % in each age group.
Fat %
Age group (Years) Gender Mean±SD P-value 95% confidence interval of the difference
18–29 M 17.94±7.33 0.000* −12.293 −5.900
F 27.05±5.96
30–39 M 23.44±3.68 0.000* −9.065 −4.000
F 29.97±5.46
40–49 M 25.28±4.68 0.000* −9.261 −3.954
F 31.89±4.65
50–59 M 26.03±5.28 0.000* −12.661 −5.803
F 35.26±2.48
Above 60 M 26.83±4.13 0.002* −7.944 1.882
F 31.74±5.23
*Represents P<0.05, M: Male participants, F: Female participants, Test applied-Independent sample t test

ANOVA shows that anthropometric parameters in five groups were different in males as evidenced for BMI (F= 11.888, P = 0.000), WC (F= 15.312, P = 0.000), WHtR (F = 14.860, P= 0.000) and fat % (F= 21.348, P= 0.000). As Group 4 had highest BMI (26.27 ± 4.46 kg/m2), WC (99.52 ± 19.39 cm), WHtR (0.59 ± 0.11) and fat% (26.03 ± 5.28%) and Group 1 has lowest of these values (22.08 ± 2.24 kg/m2), (82.58 ± 9.2 cm), (0.49 ± 0.05) and (17.95 ± 7.33%), respectively. Post-hoc analysis of these groups reveals that Group 1 had significantly lesser BMI than Group 2 (P = 0.012), 3 (P = 0.000) and 4 (P = 0.000). WC, WHtR and fat % of Group 1 were lesser than all other groups (P = 0.001, P = 0.000, P = P = 0.000 and P = 0.001, respectively). Group 5 had lesser BMI than Group 4 (P = 0.018), [Table 5]. Almost similar results were observed when age-wise comparisons of anthropometric parameters were done for female participants separately. ANOVA shows that groups were different when compared for BMI (F = 5.214, P = 0.013), WC (F = 7.732, P = 0.082), WHtR (F = 5.877, P = 0.000) and fat % (F = 4.988, P = 0.011). BMI, WHtR and fat% of Group 1 were lower than Group 3 (P = 0.001, 0.022 and 0.018, respectively) and Group 4 (P = 0.007, 0.003 and 0.000, respectively) WC of Group 1 was lower than Group 4 (P = 0.018), [Table 6].

Table 5: Comparison of anthropometric parameters among individual age groups of male subjects.
Dependent variable (I) Age group (J) Age group Mean difference (I-J) P-value 95% confidence interval
BMI 1 2 2.360* 0.012 −4.371 −0.348
3 −4.468* 0.000 −6.556 −2.379
4 −4.191* 0.000 −6.565 −1.816
5 −1.241 0.437 −3.252 0.769
2 3 −2.108 0.104 −4.465 0.249
4 −1.830 0.306 −4.445 0.783
5 1.118 0.663 −1.169 3.407
3 4 0.277 0.999 −2.396 2.951
5 3.227* 0.002 0.869 5.584
4 5 2.949* 0.018 0.335 5.563
WC 1 2 −9.405* 0.001 −15.692 −3.119
3 −14.313* 0.000 −20.841 −7.784
4 −16.940* 0.000 −24.363 −9.517
5 −9.405* 0.001 −15.692 −3.119
2 3 −4.907 0.357 −12.275 2.460
4 −7.535 0.086 −15.706 0.635
5 0 1.000 −7.154 7.154
3 4 −2.627 0.909 −10.986 5.731
5 4.907 0.357 −2.460 12.275
4 5 7.535 0.086 −0.635 15.706
Fat % 1 2 −5.492* 0.000 −8.632 −2.351
3 −7.330* 0.000 −10.591 −4.068
4 −8.084* 0.000 −11.793 −4.376
5 −8.886* 0.000 −12.027 −5.746
2 3 −1.837 0.644 −5.518 1.843
4 −2.592 0.407 −6.674 1.489
5 −3.394 0.072 −6.968 0.179
3 4 −0.754 0.988 −4.930 3.421
5 −1.556 0.772 −5.237 2.124
4 5 −0.801 0.983 −4.884 3.280
WHtR 1 2 −0.045* 0.016 −0.084 −0.005
3 −0.089* 0.000 −0.129 −0.047
4 −0.102* 0.000 −0.148 −0.055
5 −0.065* 0.000 −0.104 −0.026
2 3 −0.043 0.071 −0.089 0.002
4 −0.056* 0.02 −0.107 −0.005
5 −0.020 0.712 −0.065 0.024
3 4 −0.013 0.957 −0.065 0.038
5 0.023 0.636 −0.022 0.069
4 5 −0.036 0.287 −0.087 0.014
*Represents P≤0.05. Test applied-post hoc Turkey HSD, Age group 1–18 to 29, 2–30 to 39, 3–40 to 49, 4–50 to 59 years, 5–60 years and above
Table 6: Comparison of anthropometric parameters among individual age groups of female subjects.
Dependent variable (I) Age group (J) Age group Mean difference (I-J) P-value 95% confidence interval
BMI 1 2 2.360* 0.012 −4.371 −0.348
3 −4.468* 0.000 −6.556 −2.379
4 −4.191* 0.000 −6.565 −1.816
5 −1.241 0.437 −3.252 0.769
2 3 −2.108 0.104 −4.465 0.249
4 −1.830 0.306 −4.445 0.783
5 1.118 0.663 −1.169 3.407
3 4 0.277 0.999 −2.396 2.951
5 3.227* 0.002 0.869 5.584
4 5 2.949* 0.018 0.335 5.563
WC 1 2 −9.405* 0.001 −15.692 −3.119
3 −14.313* 0.000 −20.841 −7.784
4 −16.940* 0.000 −24.363 −9.517
5 −9.405* 0.001 −15.692 −3.119
2 3 −4.907 0.357 −12.275 2.460
4 −7.535 0.086 −15.706 0.635
5 0 1.000 −7.154 7.154
3 4 −2.627 0.909 −10.986 5.731
5 4.907 0.357 −2.460 12.275
4 5 7.535 0.086 −0.635 15.706
Fat % 1 2 −5.492* 0.000 −8.632 −2.351
3 −7.330* 0.000 −10.591 −4.068
4 −8.084* 0.000 −11.793 −4.376
5 −8.886* 0.000 −12.027 −5.746
2 3 −1.837 0.644 −5.518 1.843
4 −2.592 0.407 −6.674 1.489
5 −3.394 0.072 −6.968 0.179
3 4 −0.754 0.988 −4.930 3.421
5 −1.556 0.772 −5.237 2.124
4 5 −0.801 0.983 −4.884 3.280
WHtR 1 2 −0.045* 0.016 −0.084 −0.005
3 −0.089* 0.000 −0.129 −0.047
4 −0.102* 0.000 −0.148 −0.055
5 −0.065* 0.000 −0.104 −0.026
2 3 −0.043 0.071 −0.089 0.002
4 −0.056* 0.02 −0.107 −0.005
5 −0.020 0.712 −0.065 0.024
3 4 −0.013 0.957 −0.065 0.038
5 0.023 0.636 −0.022 0.069
4 5 −0.036 0.287 −0.087 0.014
*Represents P≤0.05. Test applied-post hoc Turkey HSD, Age group 1–18 to 29, 2–30 to 39, 3–40 to 49, 4–50 to 59 years, 5–60 years and above

DISCUSSION

Age Correlates with Detrimental Body Composition Changes

Age-dependent progression of obesity in both genders is evident by the results obtained. Anthropometric parameters also exhibit correlation among them. Positive correlation of BMI with WC and fat % indicates that the BMI changes were primarily due to increase in fat content and that with WC and WHtR are indicative of abdominal obesity.[13,20] The subjects participated in the study had abdominal or central adiposity, as their mean value of WC and WHtR was higher than cutoffs decided for Indian population [Table 1].[21,24]

Age was found to correlate with all anthropometric measures indicating age-dependent increase in fat mass and this increase is primarily due to deposition of fat in the abdominal regions. FFM index and lean mass index have negative correlations with aging in Chinese Han males older than 50 years, whereas fat mass index had a positive correlation with age.[10] Increase in body fat and decreased lean mass with age suggestive of reducing resting energy expenditure (REE) with age and obesity being a contributing factor in lowering REE further setting a vicious cycle of detrimental change in body composition.[25,26] This also does not rule out the possibility of reducing REE of per unit cell mass of each organ (28). Another possibility includes decreased macronutrient oxidation rate with age and increased fat mass.[27]

Characteristic changes in anthropometric parameters are age group specific

Age group wise analysis of anthropometric parameters reveals an expected observation of lower BMI, WC and fat % in age group of 18–29 years in males indicative of higher activity level and higher REE in this age group [Table 5]. Subjects had their BMI, WC and fat % mean value lesser than the obesity/abdominal obesity cutoff values [Table 1]. This age group primarily indulges in sport and exercise activities and remains more concerned of body fitness as compared with childhood or higher age groups.[25]

There was no significant difference of anthropometric parameters between ages Groups 2 and 3 [Table 5]. This is the middle age group comprising 30–49 years age. This may be indicative of an interesting change in lifestyle pattern of present generation as there is increased fitness awareness and health consciousness in this age.[28] This is the period of onset of metabolically unhealthy obesity and related complications such as diabetes, hypertension and cardiovascular diseases[29]. Disease awareness through increased outreach of preventive measures has wider coverage; nowadays, strengthening dietary modifications, yoga and other exercise practices.[30]

Group 5 had lesser weight and BMI than Group 4, indicative of loss in body mass in older age [Table 5]. There have been observations of decreased lean body mass in subjects older than 60 years.[31] However, we did not observe any change in WC or fat % indicating no significant loss of weight in aged individuals. Lesser BMI with no change in WC or fat % has two probabilities; either there was loss of lean mass with no change in body fat, or loss of subcutaneous fat with or without decreased lean mass,[32,33] though we did not measure lean body mass to confirm it conclusively.

Age specific variations in parameters have gender differences

There were no significant differences of anthropometric parameters between Groups 1 and 2 indicative of no change in body weight in initial ageing in females [Table 6]. This is contrary to finding that these age groups in India, females are usually subjected to marriage and child birth, which is supposed to cause increased body fat.[34,35] Again the plausible reason for this may be the increased awareness toward maintaining proper body shape and fitness, which can abrogate pregnancy associated changes in body composition.[36,37] Groups 3 and 4 had higher BMI, WC and fat % as compared to Group 1, suggestive of age-related deposition of fat. Another important inference can be drawn from this observation is, age 30–39 years may be the age group of transition of fat accumulation in females. BMI was comparable among male and females in all age groups while WC was higher in males aged 30–49 years indicative of central obesity in males of this age group [Table 2]. Similar to the previous studies, we also reported higher fat % in females than males in each age group [Table 3].[11,38] Amount as well as sites of fat deposition is remarkably different in males and females. Females tend to accumulate fat at hip and thighs and males generally develop abdominal obesity.[8] Role of androgen and oestrogen is strongly implicated in differential distribution of body fat in males and females, respectively. Android type of fat distribution may be observed after menopause in females.[39]

Limitations

Detailed information regarding diet, physical activity, age at marriage and parity would have given an insight for explanation for observed differences. In addition, measurement of lean body mass and REE of each age group should have been performed to understand the physiology of age- and gender- wise differences in anthropometry parameters.

Future perspective: The findings of the study may be useful in identification of the age of progression of obesity in both genders, and for planning of further studies aiming to administer lifestyle modifications in obesity.

CONCLUSION

There exist differences in anthropometric measures in different age groups of both genders. BMI, WC, WHtR and fat % tend to increase with age, indicative of increase in adiposity and central obesity with progressing age. Males in general have higher WC than females but lesser total fat %.Younger age participants tend to have lesser body mass, fat mass and abdominal adiposity. Gender differences in obesity may show age group specific variations as males of middle age group have higher WC.

Declaration of patient consent

Patient’s consent not required as patients identity is not disclosed or compromised.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. . WHO Fact Sheet, Obesity and Overweight Geneva: World Health Organization; .
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , et al. Prevalence of generalized and abdominal obesity in urban and rural India-the ICMR-INDIAB study (Phase-I) [ICMR-NDIAB-3] Indian J Med Res. 2015;142:139-50.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , . The epidemiology of obesity: A big picture. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015;33:673-89.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , . Understanding the role of maternal diet on kidney development; an opportunity to improve cardiovascular and renal health for future generations. Nutrients. 2015;7:1881-905.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , . The elevated susceptibility to diabetes in India: An evolutionary perspective. Front Public Health. 2016;4:145.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , . Nutrition transition in India: Secular trends in dietary intake and their relationship to diet-related non-communicable diseases. J Diabetes. 2011;3:278-92.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. . Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet. 2004;363:157-63.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , et al. Body fat deposition in adult obese women. I patterns of fat distribution. Am J Clin Nutr. 1988;47:225-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , . Age-related changes in total and regional fat distribution. Ageing Res Rev. 2009;8:339-48.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , . Age-related changes in body composition and association between body composition with bone mass density by body mass index in chinese han men over 50-year-old. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0130400.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , . Age-related differences in fat-free mass; skeletalmuscle; body cell mass and fat mass between 18 and 94 years. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2001;55:663-72.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , et al. changes in body composition according to age and sex among young non-diabetic korean adults: The kangbuk samsung health study. Endocrinol Metab. 2017;32:442-50.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , et al. Waist circumference and cardiometabolic risk: A consensus statement from shaping America's health: Association for weight management and obesity prevention; NAASO, the obesity society; the American society for nutrition; and the American diabetes association. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:1647-52.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , . Associations between gender, age and waist circumference. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010;64:6-15.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , . Age and gender based prevalence of obesity in residents of Punjab, India. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2019;8:1038-43.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , . Physical exercise and morbid obesity: A systematic review. ABCD Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2013;26(Suppl 1):67-73.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. , . Insulin-associated weight gain in diabetes-causes, effects and coping strategies. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2007;9:799-812.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. . WHO Expert Committee on Physical Status: The Use and Interpretation of Anthropometry Physical Status Geneva: World Health Organization; . p. :13.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , , et al. Measurement of waist circumference: Midabdominal or iliac crest? Diabetes Care. 2013;36:1660-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. . Waist-to-height ratio as a screening tool for obesity and cardiometabolic risk. Korean J Pediatr. 2016;59:425-31.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. , , . Determination of body composition from skinfold thickness: A validation study. Arch Dis Child. 1995;73:305-10.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. , . Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: Measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 years. Br J Nutr. 1974;32:77-97.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , . Body composition in selective groups of elite Indian sportsmen: A comparative study. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 2019;63:303-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , . Cutoff values for normal anthropometric variables in Asian Indian adults. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:1380-4.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , . Is there evidence for an age-related reduction in metabolic rate? J Appl Physiol. 1998;85:2196-204.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. . Physical activity in aging: Changes in patterns and their relationship to health and function. J Gerontol Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011;56(Suppl 2):13-22.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , , , , et al. Age-dependent changes in resting energy expenditure (ree): Insights from detailed body composition analysis in normal and overweight healthy caucasians. Nutrients. 2016;8:322.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , , , . Awareness of physical activity in healthy middle-aged adults: A cross-sectional study of associations with sociodemographic, biological, behavioural, and psychological factors. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:421.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. , , , , . Obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular diseases in india: Public health challenges. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2017;13:65-80.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. , . Prevention of overweight and obesity: How effective is the current public health approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010;7:765-83.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. , . Decreasing lean body mass with age: Challenges and opportunities for novel therapies. Endocrinol Metab. 2017;32:422-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. , , , , . Lower resting metabolic rate in the elderly may not be entirely due to changes in body composition. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005;59:255-62.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. , , , , , . Anthropometric measures and nutritional status in a healthy elderly population. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:1-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. , . Overweight and obesity among women by economic stratum in Urban India. J Heal Popul Nutr. 2014;32:79-88.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. , , , , , , et al. Postpartum weight retention risk factors and relationship to obesity at 1 year. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125:144-52.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. , , , , . A study on consciousness of adolescent girls about their body image. Indian J Community Med 201;. ;36:197-202.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. , , . Baby or beauty: A Q study into post pregnancy body image. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2005;23:19-31.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. , , , , , . Studies in the distribution of body fat: I. Effects of age, sex, and obesity. J Gerontol Med Sci. 1989;44:66-73.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. . Sexual dimorphism of body composition. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;21:415-30.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
8,237

PDF downloads
18,900
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections

Suggested read for related articles:

© Copyright 2024 – Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology.
Published by Scientific Scholar on behalf of Association of Physiologists and Pharmacologists of India.

ISSN (Print): 0019-5499
ISSN (Online): 2582 – 2799

Scientific Scholar CrossRef Creative Commons Open Acess Portico

Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology

Copyright Form


Manuscript Number: ___________________
Title of the Manuscript: ________________________________________


I/we certify that I/we have participated sufficiently in the intellectual content, conception and design of this work or the analysis and interpretation of the data (when applicable), as well as the writing of the manuscript, to take public responsibility for it and have agreed to have my/our name listed as a contributor. I/we believe the manuscript represents valid work. Each author confirms they meet the criteria for authorship as established by the ICMJE. Neither this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content under my/our authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere, except as described in the covering letter. I/we certify that all the data collected during the study is presented in this manuscript and no data from the study has been or will be published separately. I/we attest that, if requested by the editors, I/we will provide the data/information or will cooperate fully in obtaining and providing the data/information on which the manuscript is based, for examination by the editors or their assignees. Financial interests, direct or indirect, that exist or may be perceived to exist for individual contributors in connection with the content of this paper have been disclosed in the cover letter. Sources of outside support of the project are named in the cover letter.


I/We hereby transfer (s), assign (s), or otherwise convey (s) all the commercial copyright ownership, including any and all rights incidental thereto, exclusively to the Journal, in the event that such work is published by the Journal. The Journal shall own the work, including

  1. copyright;
  2. the right to grant permission to republish the article in whole or in part, with or without fee;
  3. the right to produce preprints or reprints and translate into languages other than English for sale or free distribution; and
  4. the right to republish the work in a collection of articles in any other mechanical or electronic format.

The author(s) holds the academic rights of the material under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-SA. This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms. CC BY-NC-SA includes the following elements:


BY: credit must be given to the creator.
NC: Only noncommercial uses of the work are permitted.
SA: Adaptations must be shared under the same terms.


We give the rights to the corresponding author to make necessary changes as per the request of the journal, do the rest of the correspondence on our behalf and he/she will act as the guarantor for the manuscript on our behalf.

All persons who have made substantial contributions to the work reported in the manuscript, but who are not contributors, are named in the Acknowledgment and have given me/us their written permission to be named. If I/we do not include an Acknowledgment that means I/we have not received substantial contributions from non-contributors and no contributor has been omitted.


Name of the author(s) Signature Date signed
Yes/No
Yes/No
Yes/No