Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Media and News
Medial Education
Medical Education
Obituary
Opinion Article
Original Article
Review Article
Short Communication
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Media and News
Medial Education
Medical Education
Obituary
Opinion Article
Original Article
Review Article
Short Communication
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Editorial
Erratum
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Media and News
Medial Education
Medical Education
Obituary
Opinion Article
Original Article
Review Article
Short Communication
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
67 (
1
); 8-14
doi:
10.25259/IJPP_569_2022

Heart rate variability in patients presenting with anginal symptoms in absence of cardiac and other diseases

Department of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Department of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Department of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Department of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

*Corresponding author: Kishore Kumar Deepak, Department of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. kkdeepak@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Khadka R, Jaryal A, Narang R, Patel C, Pandey RM, Deepak KK. Heart rate variability in patients presenting with anginal symptoms in absence of cardiac and other diseases. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 2023;67:8-14.

Abstract

Objectives:

Angina is a symptom of coronary artery disease (CAD). Modulation of cardiac autonomic tone as assessed by heart rate (HR) variability (HRV) is found reduced in patients with CAD; myocardial ischemia, myocardial infarction and some other cardiovascular diseases. Reduced HRV has been found associated with sudden cardiac death in these CAD patients. Several patients present with anginal symptoms clinically in absence of CAD or other diseases. The status of HRV is not much clear in these patients. Thus, we aimed to assess HRV in patients with angina with and without myocardial ischemia and compare it with HRV of healthy subjects of similar age groups and follow-up patients for 1 year for cardiac/health events.

Materials and Methods:

The study included 61 consecutive male patients clinically presenting with angina and 30 healthy subjects. Based on Thallium-201 myocardial perfusion Single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) imaging, patients were divided into two groups; patients with myocardial perfusion defects (MPD), (n = 33, age 54.91 ± 7.43 years) and patients with no MPD (NMPD), NMPD (n = 28, age 53.04 ± 8.50 years). Short-term HRV was assessed in all patients and subjects in resting supine position following standard protocol. All MPD and 25 NMPD patients could be followed up for 1 year for cardiac/health events.

Results:

Surprisingly, the NMPD patients showed significantly reduced HRV, Standard deviation of the N-N intervals, The square root of the mean squared differences of successive N-N intervals, Percentage of the number of interval differences of successive N-N intervals greater than >50 ms divided by total number of R-R intervals, low frequency (LF) power, High Frequency (HF) power and total power as compared to both MPD patients and healthy subjects. (Total power [NMPD vs. MPD]: 610.1 [379.9–1072.8] vs. 1508.0 [748.4–2339.4] millisecond squares (ms2), P = 0.001), healthy subjects (Total power: 1414.6 [1104.6-2141.5] ms2, P = 0.001). The markers of sympathetic tone; LF (normalised unit) and LF/HF ratio were higher in NMPD patients as compared to MPD patients resulting in an altered sympathovagal balance. During a 1-year follow-up, sudden death was seen in one MPD patient (3.1%) and two NMPD patients (8%).

Conclusion:

The NMPD patients showed significantly reduced HRV as compared to both MPD patients and Healthy subjects with an altered sympathovagal balance. Sudden death was also seen in NMPD patients as MPD patients.

Keywords

Heart rate variability
Thallium-201
Anginal symptoms
Cardiac autonomic tone
Sudden death

INTRODUCTION

Angina is a symptom of coronary artery disease (CAD). It is a type of chest pain radiating to the left arm, basically developed due to reduced oxygen supply to the cardiac tissue. Modulation of cardiac autonomic tone as assessed by heart rate (HR) variability (HRV) is found reduced in patients with ischaemic heart diseases (IHD).[1-5]

The HRV is a non-invasive tool to assess beat-to-beat variations in the HR that is, the beat-to-beat variations in the R-R intervals. The beat-to-beat variations in HR are due to continuous changes in the sympathetic and parasympathetic outflow to the heart.[6] Therefore, HRV has become a reliable tool for the assessment of modulation of cardiac autonomic tone. The HRV was also found reduced in patients with uncomplicated CAD, particularly, vagal tone was found to be reduced.[2] Furthermore, a decrease in HRV, in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) was found to be associated with an increase in cardiovascular-related morbidity and mortality.[3,5,7]

Patients with IHD experience chest pain due to stimulation of cardiac spinal afferents by chemical adenosine and bradykinin released during ischaemia.[8] The pain may also occur in the shoulder, arm, neck, jaw or back. A set of investigations are performed to diagnose IHD cases following American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) practice guidelines,[9] which include blood investigations, 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG), treadmill test, thallium-201 myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging (Tl-201 MPI) and coronary angiography. The coronary angiography allows visualisation of the site and extent of occlusion. It is an invasive procedure. While the Tl-201 MPI is a non-invasive procedure. It is recommended as an investigation in patients with angina for the detection of myocardial ischemia.[9,10] The Tl-201 MPI demonstrated a high degree of accuracy in determination of presence, location and extent of IHD.[11-13] The Tl-201 MPI was also found to be sensitive for the detection of microvascular angina in patients with transient ST-segment elevation in treadmill tests and normal coronary angiography scans,[14,15] a reduced HRV was reported in these patients of microvascular angina.[16] Most of the published research showed that patients clinically presenting with angina whether they had myocardial ischaemia, MI or microvascular angina showed reduced HRV that is, reduced modulation of cardiac autonomic tone.

There are several patients who clinically present with symptoms like angina; however, on extensive investigations, they do not have any objective evidence of myocardial ischaemia or other known diseases. The status of HRV was not known in these patients with angina with no cardiac and other diseases. We found markedly reduced HRV and sudden death in a patient presenting with anginal symptoms in absence of cardiovascular and other diseases.[17] Thus, we aimed to assess short-term (HRV) in patients with angina with and without myocardial perfusion defects (MPD) and compared it with HRV of healthy subjects, and followed-up on all patients for 1 year for cardiac or other health-related problems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants

The study included 61 consecutive male patients presenting with angina, age 52.3 ± 7.9 years. All patients were referred from the department of cardiology of the institute after appropriate clinical and laboratory investigations. Patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent recent angina (≤2 months) were included in the study. They were on conventional therapy (Ecospirin, statins, nitrates, beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers).

Patients with unstable angina, MI (≤3.5 years), cardiac failure, bundle branch block, cardiomyopathy, frequent ventricular ectopics or other arrhythmias, uncontrolled hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney diseases, chronic respiratory diseases, thyroid dysfunction and patients taking drugs other than conventional cardiac drugs, smokers and alcoholics were excluded from the study.

Thirty healthy subjects with no systemic diseases, non-smokers and non-alcoholics served as controls. They had normal ECG and normal cardiovascular autonomic functions as assessed by Ewings’ battery of tests.[18]

The Ethics Committee of the institute approved the study and written informed consent was taken from all participants before their participation.

Study protocol

Short-term HRV of all patients was assessed in Autonomic Function Lab, Department of Physiology of the institute between 9:00 and 11:00 AM in a quiet room at room temperature 25 ± 1°C. Treatment of the patients was withheld before the test (β-blockers for 72 h, calcium channel blockers and other drugs for 24 h). Patients avoided tea and coffee for 24 h before the tests. A standardised proforma was used to record the history of patients, demographic profile and presence of any additional signs and symptoms.

All patients underwent stress-redistribution Tl-201 MPI in Nuclear cardiology Lab, Department of Nuclear Medicine of the institute after assessment of HRV on the same day for the assessment of myocardial perfusion. It was performed using standard protocol of stress-redistribution Tl-201 MPI.[19,20]

All patients underwent an exercise protocol on treadmill. Images were acquired within 10–15-min post-exercise stress using standard acquisition protocol of Tl-201 MPI. Similar protocol was used for acquiring redistribution images 3–4 h after the exercise.

Patients were divided into two groups based on the results of the Tl-201 MPI; patients with perfusion defects (MPD, n = 33) and patients with no perfusion defects (no MPD [NMPD], n = 28).

All patients were followed up for 1 year for any cardiac or other health problems. The patients maintained a diary during the follow-up period for the episode of chest pain, breathlessness, palpitations, tightness or heaviness in the chest or any other health problem.

Signal acquisition and processing for HRV

The ECG signals were acquired simultaneously using Nevrokard Multichannel Data Acquisition Software (ADC-8, Slovenia) at sampling rate of 500 Hz for 5 min in supine position after 15 min of supine rest. The acquired signals of ECG were checked for presence of artefacts and corrected following standard protocol. Recordings were discarded if a large number of artefacts were present.

Signal analysis for HRV

The processed ECG signals were analysed using time-domain and frequency-domain methods for HRV measures.[6] Parameters computed in time-domain methods were Standard deviation of the N-N intervals (SDNN), The square root of the mean squared differences of successive N-N intervals (rMSSD), The proportion derived by dividing the number of interval differences of successive N-N intervals greater than 50 ms by the total number of N-N intervals (pNN50) and Coefficient of variance of the R-R intervals (CoV).

In frequency-domain method, spectral powers of different frequency components in HR were analysed using Fast Fourier Transform algorithm. A Hanning window was used and the power spectrum was subsequently plotted for frequency bands very low frequency (VLF) (0.001–0.04 Hz); low frequency (LF) (0.04–0.15 Hz); high frequency (HF) (0.15–0.4 Hz) and for entire band total power (0.001–0.4 Hz). The power was calculated as absolute power in millisecond squares and normalised units (nu). Since VLF value is not appropriate for the short-term analysis of HRV,[6] it was not considered for the present study.

Ejection fraction (EF) and other parameters of patients

EF was calculated from the post-stress gated images in Tl-201 MPI. The left ventricle was also assessed for the regional wall motion abnormalities (if any). The total exercise duration was noted for each patient and the rate pressure product (RPP) was calculated at the maximum exercise during the treadmill stress. The ST segment changes were evaluated from ECG recorded during exercise. Post-stress EF ≥65% was considered normal.

Statistical analysis

The general characteristics among three groups were compared using one-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni tests and data are expressed as mean ± SD. The normally distributed HRV parameters were compared using analysis of covariance after adjustment for age, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and HR and are expressed as adjusted mean (95% Confidence Interval). The non-normally distributed HRV parameters were compared using Kruskal–Wallis test followed by multiple comparisons and data are expressed as median (inter-quartile range). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The data were analysed using Stata 9.1 (Texas, USA).

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics of MPD, NMPD, and healthy subjects

All patients and healthy subjects were comparable in terms of their height, weight, body mass index, diastolic blood pressure and respiratory rate [Table 1]. Both groups of patients had significantly higher SBP than healthy subjects. The MPD patients had higher age range and NMPD patients had higher HR than healthy subjects. However, all the parameters were comparable between MPD and NMPD patients [Table 1]. Comparison of parameters of HRV among MPD and NMPD patients and healthy subjects was done after adjustment for age, HR and SBP.

Table 1: General characteristics of MPD and NMPD patients and healthy subjects.
Angina patients MPD versus NMPD patients P1 MPD versus Healthy subjects P2 NMPD versus healthy subjects P3
Parameters MPD (n=33) (mean±SD) NMPD (n=28) (mean±SD) Healthy subjects (n=30) (mean±SD)
Age (years)
Height (cm)
Weight (kg)
Body mass index (kg/m2)
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)
Heart rate (bpm)
Respiratory rate (breath/min)
54.9±7.4
167.4±5.6
68.9±8.4
24.6±2.6
123.0±12.6
79.4±6.4
68.7±10.0
17.0±2.9
53.0±8.5
165.4±6.8
66.9±12.4
24.4±4.0
127.1±17.2
79.6±8.7
73.7±12.2
17.3±4.2
48.8±6.8
165.6±6.3
66.4±8.2
24.2±2.5
113.2±10.6
77.2±5.8
64.7±5.6
17.0±3.8
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
0.010
NS
NS
NS
0.024
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
0.001
NS
0.002
NS

MPD: Myocardial perfusion defects, NMPD: No myocardial perfusion defects, SD: Standard deviation. P<0.05 was considered as statistical significance, NS: No significant difference

The HRV parameters of MPD, NMPD and healthy subjects

The time-domain parameters of HRV (CoV, SDNN, rMSSD and pNN50) and the frequency-domain parameters of HRV (spectral powers of LF, HF and total power) were significantly lower in NMPD patients as compared to both MPD patients and healthy subjects. The LFnu and LF/HF ratio was significantly higher and HFnu was significantly lower in NMPD patients than MPD patients, whereas, LFnu, HFnu and LF/HF ratio were comparable between NMPD patients and healthy subjects. All the time-domain and frequency-domain parameters of HRV were comparable between MPD patients and healthy subjects [Table 2].

Table 2: Comparison of parameters of HRV among MPD and NMPD patients and healthy subjects after adjustment for age, heart rate and systolic blood pressure.
Angina patients MPD versus NMPD patients P1 MPD versus healthy subjects P2 NMPD Versus healthy subjects P3
Parameters of HRV MPD (n=33) mean (95% CI) NMPD (n=28) mean (95% CI) Healthy subjects (n=30) mean (95% CI)
Time domain parameters
CoV (%) 4.4 (4.0–4.8) 3.4 (2.9–3.9) 4.6 (4.2–4.1) 0.001 NS 0.001
SDNN (ms) 39.0 (35.3–42.6) 29.4 (25.3–33.6) 40.0 (36.0–44.1) 0.001 NS 0.001
rMSSD (ms) 30.6 (27.0–34.2) 20.2 (16.1–24.3) 29.3 (25.37–33.3) 0.001 NS 0.004
*pNN50 (%) 3.7 (1.4–9.7) 0.3 (0–1.9) 5.4 (1.4–7.4) 0.001 NS 0.001
Frequency domain parameters
*LF power (ms2) 375.1 (262.4–508.8) 158.4 (79.1–296.5) 454.0 (317.7–681.4) 0.006 NS 0.004
*HF power (ms2) 293.9 (163.7–665.0) 138.0 (77.1–207.4) 287.8 (217.5–594.6) 0.001 NS 0.014
*Total power (ms2) 1508.0 (748.4–2339.4) 610.1 (379.9–1072.8) 1414.6 (1104.6–2141.5) 0.001 NS 0.001
HF (nu) 46.6 (41.0–52.2) 38.5 (32.2–44.9) 37.8 (31.6–44.0) 0.013 NS NS
LF (nu) 46.3 (40.7–52.0) 55.3 (48.9–61.8) 53.7 (47.5–60.0) 0.037 NS NS
*LF/HF ratio 0.9 (0.5–1.4) 1.9 (0.9–2.8) 1.5 (0.9–2.6) 0.015 NS NS

HRV: Heart rate variability, CoV: Coefficient of variance, SDNN: Standard deviation of the R-R intervals, rMSSD: The square root of the mean squared differences of successive R-R intervals, pNN50: Percentage of the number of interval differences of successive R-R intervals >50 ms divided by total number of R-R intervals, LF: Low frequency, HF: High frequency, nu: normalized unit, MPD: Myocardial perfusion defects, NMPD: No myocardial perfusion defects, ms2: Millisecond squares, CI: Confidence interval. P<0.05 was considered as statistical significance, NS: No significant difference. *Compared using Kruskal–Wallis test followed by multiple comparisons and data are expressed in median (inter-quartile range)

EF and other parameters of the patients

The MPD patients had significantly lower EF (55.1 ± 12.8 vs. 68.8 ± 2.1, P = 0.001) and RPP (22251.3 ± 3153.1 vs. 24828.6 ± 3919.7, P = 0.006) than NMPD patients. In 33 MPD patients, 19 (58%) patients had EF <65%, and 23 (70%) patients had regional wall motion abnormalities, whereas in NMPD patients none of the patients had EF <65% and none of the patients had regional wall motion abnormalities. The exercise durations between MPD patients and NMPD patients were comparable (6.38 ± 1.83 vs. 6.49 ± 2.21, P = 0.839). In MPD patients, 7 (21%) patients had ST segments depression >2 mm, whereas none of the NMPD patients had ST segments depression or elevation.

Events in MPD and NMPD patients during 1-year follow-up period

Thirty-two patients in MPD group and 25 patients in NMPD group were followed-up for 1 year. One (3.1 %) patient in MPD group and 2 (8 %) patients in NMPD group died during the follow-up period (statistically no significant differences). The MPD patient who died was of 62-years-old, had an EF of 58% with fixed perfusion defects in the entire inferior wall extending up to distal inferoapical region, and he suffered from viral fever before the death. The two NMPD patients who died were 40 and 43-years-old, post-stress EFs were 69% and 68%, respectively, RPP was higher in both the patients. Both the patients had no wall motion abnormality, no ST changes, and no signs of neurological or other diseases. No obvious symptoms other than restlessness and nervousness were reported in both the patients before 4–5 h of death. Both patients died after mid night.

DISCUSSION

The study assessed the modulation of cardiac autonomic tone using HRV in patients clinically presenting with angina with MPD and with NMPD and compared them with the HRV of healthy subjects. The major findings of the study were (1) The HRV of MPD patients and healthy subjects were comparable, (2) The NMPD patients had reduced overall HRV as compared to both MPD patients and healthy subjects and (3) Sudden death within 1 year was seen in both MPD (3.1%) and NMPD (8%) patients.

In the present study, both time-domain and frequency-domain parameters of HRV of MPD patients were comparable to healthy subjects. Similar results were reported in a study by Adamopoulos et al.,[21] in which HRV of patients with CAD was comparable to healthy subjects. However, Wennerblom et al.[2] reported a reduction in vagal tone in patients with CAD as compared to healthy controls. The differences in results may be due to differences in the study population and other factors. In this study, females and smokers were also included and 24-h Holter recording was performed for HRV, while in the present study only male patients with no other diseases and no history of smoking or alcohol intake were included in the study. Short-term HRV for 5 min was recorded under laboratory conditions. These factors may have affected the results.

In contrast, in the present study, the NMPD patients showed reduced HRV parameters (rMSSD, pNN50 and HF powers) as compared to both MPD patients and healthy subjects. The rMSSD, pNN50 and HF power are considered the markers of parasympathetic tone.[6] Thus, the results revealed the decreased parasympathetic tone in NMPD patients. Similarly, NMPD patients showed reduced other HRV parameters (CoV, SDNN, LF power and total power) as compared to both MPD patients and healthy subjects. These CoV, SDNN and total power are considered the markers of modulation of overall cardiac autonomic tone and the LF power is considered the marker of both sympathetic and parasympathetic tone.[6] Thus, these results revealed decrease in modulation of overall cardiac autonomic tone in NMPD patients.

The HFnu, a marker of parasympathetic tone, was lower in NMPD patients whereas, LFnu and LF/HF ratio, which are markers of sympathetic tone and sympathovagal balance, respectively,[6] was found to be higher in NMPD patients as compared to MPD patients, whereas the NMPD patients and healthy subjects had comparable HFnu, LFnu and LF/HF ratio.

These results revealed that as compared to MPD patients NMPD patients had not only reduced modulation of overall cardiac autonomic tone and parasympathetic tone, but the sympathovagal balance was also shifted towards sympathetic predominance as has been shown in patients after acute MI.[1,7] About 8% of NMPD patients had sudden death during 1-year follow-up in absence of any specific abnormality. Steg et al.[22] found about 9.1% of patients clinically presenting with anginal symptoms had no evidence of ischemia. The risk of cardiovascular-related deaths or non-fatal MI occurred greater in those patients than in patients with ischemia alone. It may be due to reduced HRV. The reduced HRV is associated with sudden death.[3] Recently, we reported severe cardiac dysautonomia and sudden death in a patient presenting with anginal symptoms in absence of cardiovascular and other diseases.[17]

The burning question is why these NMPD patients experience angina in absence of myocardial ischaemia and other known systemic diseases and they have risk of sudden death. It may be due to decrease in HRV. Possibly, coronary blood flow and other cardiovascular functions are not adequate to meet the demand of the body during exertion/stress due to reduced modulation of autonomic tone. Thus, lactic acid and other metabolites accumulate in the myocardium, which stimulates cardiac sympathetic afferent fibres that is, nociceptive fibres in the heart and patients develop angina in absence of CAD. In addition to this, stimulation of cardiac afferents reflex tries to enhance sympathetic activation causing increased HR and cardiac contractility. However, modulation of overall cardiac autonomic tone is already reduced in these patients. Thus, possibly it is not compensated appropriately and ultimately cardiac tissues become fatigued and function abnormally towards the ventricular fibrillation and sudden death. The above proposed mechanisms are supported by some experimental studies.

In animal experiments lactic acid and other metabolites, stimulated cardiac sympathetic c-fibre afferents to a greater extent.[23,24] In another study, in sham rats, acute cardiac sympathetic afferent reflex activation by epicardial application of bradykinin increased HR and myocardial contractility.[25]

In human study, Fallen et al.[26] studied cardiac energy metabolism in response to stress in three groups of patients with aortic stenosis. (1) Patients with aortic stenosis without angina or CAD showed normal increase in coronary flow, decreased myocardial oxygen extraction and no myocardial lactate production in majority of patients (85%), which suggested that energy supply was adequate to the demand; (2) Patients with aortic stenosis with angina but no CAD showed insignificant increase in coronary flow, increased myocardial oxygen extraction in about 60% of patients and abnormal glycolysis in all patients, which suggested that compensatory mechanisms were not adequate and (3) In aortic stenosis with angina and CAD, coronary flow increased normally, myocardial oxygen extraction decreased normally, but abnormal lactate metabolism occurred in most patients. That suggested adequate overall coronary reserve but evidence of regional ischemia. In case of cardiac ischaemia, sympathetic activation is pro-arrhythmic for ventricular fibrillations leading to sudden death.[27]

Further studies are needed for the exploration of other underlying mechanisms to explain the development of anginal symptoms in patients presenting with angina with NMPD s and other known diseases. It will also help the management of such patients.

CONCLUSION

In the present study, MPD patients showed comparable cardiac autonomic tone to healthy subjects. In contrast, the NMPD patients showed reduced parasympathetic and overall cardiac autonomic tone as compared to both MPD patients and healthy subjects and altered sympathovagal balance in comparison to MPD patients. Surprisingly, sudden death was seen in NMPD patients similar to in MPD patients. A comprehensive study is required to identify the key factors leading to the autonomic neural derangement and sudden death in NMPD group of patients and their management.

Acknowledgment

We would like to acknowledge all patients and healthy subjects for their participation in this study and members of Autonomic Function Lab, of the Institute for their continuous help and support.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

References

  1. , , , , , , et al. Evidence of functional alterations in sympathetic activity after myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 1993;14:1334-43.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , et al. Reduced heart rate variability in ischemic heart disease is only partially caused by ischemia. An HRV study before and after PTCA. Cardiology. 2000;94:146-51.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , et al. Prognostic implications of autonomic function assessed by analyses of catecholamines and heart rate variability in stable angina pectoris. Heart. 2002;87:415-22.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , . Prognostic value of heart rate variability after acute myocardial infarction. Med Sci Monit. 2004;10:CR307-15.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. . Heart rate variability and non-linear dynamics in risk stratification. Front Physiol. 2011;2:81.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. . Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Task force of the European society of cardiology and the North American society of pacing and electrophysiology. Eur Heart J. 1996;17:354-81.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , . Frequency domain measures of heart period variability and mortality after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1992;85:164-71.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. . Mechanism of cardiac pain. Annu Rev Physiol. 1999;61:143-67.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina-summary article: A report of the American college of cardiology/ American heart association task force on practice guidelines (committee on the management of patients with chronic stable angina) J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:159-68.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/ STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: A report of the American college of cardiology foundation/American heart association task force on practice guidelines, and the American college of physicians, American association for thoracic surgery, preventive cardiovascular nurses association, society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions, and society of thoracic surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:2564-603.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , et al. Quantitative rotational thallium-201 tomography for identifying and localizing coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1988;77:316-27.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , . Improved diagnostic performance of exercise thallium-201 single photon emission computed tomography over planar imaging in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: A receiver operating characteristic analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;13:600-12.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , et al. Quantitative severity of stress thallium-201 myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography defects in one-vessel coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1993;72:273-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , . Thallium scans in syndrome X. Br Heart J. 1992;68:48-50.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , et al. Regional distribution and extent of perfusion abnormalities, and the lung to heart uptake ratios during exercise thallium-201 SPECT imaging in patients with cardiac syndrome X. Can J Cardiol. 2005;21:57-62.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , et al. Abnormal autonomic control of the cardiovascular system in syndrome X. Am J Cardiol. 1994;73:1174-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , . Severe cardiac dysautonomia and sudden death in a patient presenting with anginal symptoms in absence of cardiovascular and other diseases: A case report. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2020;58:261-4.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. , . Diagnosis and management of diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982;285:916-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , , et al. Guidelines for clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging report of the American college of cardiology/American 'heart association task force on assessment of diagnostic and therapeutic cardiovascular procedures (committee on radionuclide imaging), developed in collaboration with the American society of nuclear cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:521-47.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , et al. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging executive summary a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines (ACC/ AHA/ASNC committee to revise the 1995 guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging) Circulation. 2003;108:1404-18.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , , et al. Impaired baroreflex sensitivity and sympathovagal balance in syndrome X. Am J Cardiol. 1998;82:862-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , , et al. Prevalence of anginal symptoms and myocardial ischemia and their effect on clinical outcomes in outpatients with stable coronary artery disease: Data from the international observational CLARIFY registry. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174:1651-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. , . Myocardial ischemia recruits mechanically insensitive cardiac sympathetic afferents in cats. J Neurophysiol. 2002;87:660-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , . Role of protons in activation of cardiac sympathetic C fibre afferents during ischaemia in cats. J Physiol. 1999;518:857-66.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. , , . Cardiac sympathetic afferent reflex control of cardiac function in normal and chronic heart failure states. J Physiol. 2017;595:2519-34.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. , , . Mechanisms of angina in aortic stenosis. Circulation. 1967;36:480-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. , . Role of the autonomic nervous system in modulating cardiac arrhythmias. Circ Res. 2014;114:1004-21.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections

Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology

Copyright Form


Title of the Manuscript: ________________________________________


I/We certify that I/we have participated sufficiently in the intellectual content, conception, and design of this work, or the analysis and interpretation of the data (when applicable), as well as the writing of the manuscript, to take public responsibility for it. I/We agree to have my/our name(s) listed as contributors and confirm that the manuscript represents valid work.

Each author confirms they meet the criteria for authorship as established by the ICMJE. Neither this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content under my/our authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere, except as described in the covering letter.

I/We certify that all data collected during the study is presented in this manuscript and that no data from the study has been or will be published separately. I/We agree to provide, upon request by the editors, any data/information on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees.

I/We have disclosed all financial interests, direct or indirect, that exist or may be perceived to exist for individual contributors in connection with the content of this manuscript in the cover letter. Sources of outside support for the project are also disclosed in the cover letter.

In accordance with open access principles, I/we grant the Journal the exclusive right to publish and distribute this work under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA) license. This license permits others to distribute, transform, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for non-commercial purposes, provided appropriate credit is given to the creator(s). Any adaptations must be shared under the same license terms. The key elements of the CC BY-NC-SA license are:

  • BY: Credit must be given to the original creator(s).
  • NC: Only non-commercial uses of the work are permitted.
  • SA: Adaptations must be shared under the same license terms.

I/We retain academic rights to the material, and the Journal is authorized to:

  1. Grant permission to republish the article in whole or in part, with or without fee.
  2. Produce preprints or reprints and translate the work into other languages for sale or free distribution.
  3. Republish the work in a collection of articles in any mechanical or electronic format.

I/We give the rights to the corresponding author to make necessary changes as requested by the Journal, handle all correspondence on our behalf, and act as the guarantor for the manuscript.

All individuals who have made substantial contributions to the work but do not meet the criteria for authorship are named in the Acknowledgment section with their written permission. If no acknowledgment is provided, it signifies that no substantial contributions were made by non-authors.


Name of the author(s) Signature Date signed Corresponding author?
Yes/No
Yes/No
Yes/No