Continuing professional development of physiologists: Role of Association of Physiologists and Pharmacologists of India
How to cite this article: Pandey AK, Continuing professional development of physiologists: Role of Association of Physiologists and Pharmacologists of India. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 2020;xx:xx.
Continuing professional development (CPD) can be defined as a broad range of activities that a person undertakes or participates, to maintain, improve or develop their knowledge and skills to the benefit of the professionals, those they work with and most importantly the patient. CPD, a broader concept than continuing medical education (CME), refers to the continuing development of the comprehensive nature of clinical practice, covering in addition to knowledge and skills of medical practice the wider domains of professionalism (e.g., medical, managerial and social subjects) needed for top quality professional performance. It includes all activities that doctors undertake, formally and informally to take care, update, develop and enhance their knowledge, skills and attitudes in response to the requirements and desire of their patients.
The better health of all citizens of the nation is the main goal of Government of India and so of the medical education. This must be as a whole the mission of the all the official associations of medical fraternity including Association of Physiologists and Pharmacologists of India (APPI) for physiologists like any other association of medical sciences. In keeping with its constitution, APPI is committed to undertakes and promote the highest scientific and ethical standards in medical education, research and health care to encourage development of learning methods, new instructional tools and innovative ideas for improved health care to the general public.
In compliance with its byelaws, the APPI hosted a physiology leaders’ summit from 25 to 26 February 2020. The purpose of the summit was to discuss implementation of CBME for UG and PG for quality improvement of medical education across India.
The APPI leaders’ summit discussed three main intentions to improve the quality of physiology education and career opportunity to physiologists:
To stimulate institutions, organisations and authorities, having accountability for medical education to formulate a uniform plan for quality improvement in accordance with CBME
To establish a system of national evaluation, accreditation and recognition of clinical physiology programmes to assure quality standards for the clinical competency in clinical physiology
To safeguard and promote physiology practice in clinical physiology and proper utilisation of physiology workforce, in the context of motivating youngsters to opt physiology as their career opportunity.
APPI as academic leader
The APPI must take responsibility for leadership and organisation of CPD activities
They should ensure that the professional leadership is evaluated regularly with respect to achievement of the mission and outcomes of CPD activities
The APPI leadership should include medical professional expert from other medical professional organisations/associations to provide various CPD activities, not directly related to clinical physiology but to other medical profession, including the health-care hospitals and the pharmaceutical/medicotechnical industry. The APPI should formalised a uniform CPD activities, which may be conducted at certain identified institutions such as medical universities, postgraduate institutes, medical colleges, professional organisations, national and international scientific organisations, local or national health authorities as well as the pharmaceutical/medicotechnical industry. The same may be supported by APPI for quality assurance and control.
How to evaluate CPD activities?
Role of APPI in programme monitoring and evaluation The APPI should establish and apply mechanisms to
Monitor and evaluate the processes and outcomes of CPD activities
Address the mission, the projected outcomes, the educational programme, assessment, if any, documentation, the individual professional participation in CPD
Make use of data to monitor and evaluate the acquired outcomes, including the ability to deliver high-quality patient care
Consider involvement of expertise in health-care delivery and in medical education for CPD evaluation
Programme assessment is the process of systematically gathering information to review the effectiveness of the competency and training. It would imply the utilisation of reliable and valid methods of information collection and analysis for the aim of demonstrating the qualities of the programme in reference to the mission and the intended and acquired outcomes. Involvement of external experts in the concerned specialty and regulatory bodies would further broaden the quality of CPD [Table1]
APPI may involve an expertise to further improve the quality and broaden the base of the training. This would facilitate monitoring the resources available, the training outcomes and the benefits derived by the individual professional.
The APPI must develop a system in collaboration with various stakeholders that encourage and recognise participation in local, national and international CPD activities, scientific meetings and other structured and formulated activities. APPI is also to ensure opportunities for physiologists to attend these structured CPD to increase the level of their competencies. Structured CPD activities may include attending courses or lectures, e- learning, institutional, national and international conferences, participation in research and specialised laboratories.
AUDIT OF PHYSIOLOGISTS’ CPD BY APPI
Every year, the constituted expert committee of APPI may select a random sample of physiologists/institute for more detailed inspection of CPD. The APPI may take action on physiology dept./institute if it is not maintaining the standard of professional competence. APPI may draft guidelines for physiology and physiologists their cooperation with any audit process applied by the APPI. The institute/physiology department/institute may be asked to provide underneath records concerning continuance of professional competence. Physiology department/physiologists who maintain professional competence in fulfilment with standards set by the APPI may get the quality control approved without difficulty. If, however, the expert committee of APPI becomes aware that department is not maintaining the standard of competence as per the guidelines, it may take action to promote confidence in the professional development considering the impact on society and other physiologists.
Diversity of academic programmes should be fostered, to account for various academic, social, economic and cultural conditions, completely different patterns of malady, and to support social responsibility. The standards give an example for medical colleges and the association or regulatory bodies that accredit them to stipulate institutional and national standard, to act as a lever for quality improvement. CPD includes all activities that doctors undertake, formally and informally, so as to update, develop and enhance their information, skills and attitudes in response to the necessities of the society. Participating in CPD is not only an obligation to gain in skills but also a requirement for enhancing the quality of health care [Table1]. CME describes continued update of knowledge within the field of information and skills of medical practice; CPD, a broader thought, refers to the continued development of the multifaceted competencies inherent in practice, covering wider domains of experience required for fine quality skilled performance. APPI should encourage physiologists to engage in reflective learning as frequently as possible. Learning should be directly related to your scope of practice in regard to local requirements. CPD should also be suitable for your level of experience in its significance and intricacy [Table1].
|What did you
Do and why?
|What did you
Learn from it
|How have you
Will you use this?
|20 January 2020–27 January 2020 (7 days)
|• Attended M-Mode, 2D and colour Doppler echocardiography
• Perform three cases independently under supervision of Dr. ABC cardiologist/radiologist/physiologist
|Understand how to assess cardiac performance
systolic and diastolic qualitatively and quantitatively
|• Teaching UG and PG
• Health care
|Certificate of attendance
CPD template for certificate of authentication
Duration of activity: Days/weeks/months
Type of activity: 2–5 sentences
What did you do? 3–7 sentences
What did you learn from it? 3–7 sentences
How have you/will you use this? 3–7 sentences
I certify that this CPD activity has been undertaken as stated above under my supervision.
Guide – HOD
Signature – Signature
Declaration of patient consent
Patient’s consent not required as there are no patients in this study.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
- 2015 & 2017 Available from: http://www.wfme.org